Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc. (1989)
green
· 18 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Bremer (1995)
Each declaration stated that the errors were caused because the attorneys “did not fully appreciate the nature and extent of [the] discovery” and “did not fully appreciate the claims of the type sought by reissue were possible.” *874 Scripps Clinic and Research Found, v. Genentech, Inc., 707 F.Supp. 1547, 1558-59 (N.D.Cal.1989), aff'd, 927 F.2d 1565 (Fed.Cir. 1991).
green
Biogen, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. (1996)
See Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation v. Genentech Inc., 707 F.Supp. 1547 , 1557 n. 15 (N.D.Cal.1989), rev’d on other grounds, 927 F.2d 1565 (Fed.Cir.1991) (“[A] determination that inequitable conduct has occurred renders the ‘entire patent’ unenforceable.
See Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc., 707 F.Supp. 1547, 1552-1562 (N.D.Cal. 1989); Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc., 724 F.Supp. 690, 691-92 (N.D.Cal.1989).
green
Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v. Genentech, Inc. (1989)
See Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation, et al. v. Genentech, Inc., et al., 707 F.Supp. 1547 (N.D.Cal. 1989).