Lofton v. State (1982)
green
· 7 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Dusko Vuksanovic v. U.S. Attorney General (2006)
The conduct prohibited by the statute— the willful destruction of a structure by fire or explosion without a lawful, legitimate purpose — evinces a certain baseness in the private and social duties a man owes to society and is “contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man.” Id. at 1215 ; see also Lofton v. State, 416 So.2d 522, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating an essential element of second-degree arson is the State’s showing “the willful…
stating an essential element of second-degree arson is the State’s showing “the willful act was done without a legitimate, lawful purpose”
green
M.T.A. v. State (2015)
See Lofton v. State, 416 So.2d 522, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 429 So.2d 6 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, DeAndrea v. Fla., 464 U.S. 843 , 104 S.Ct. 142 , 78 L.Ed.2d 134 (1983).
green
State v. Hoag (1982)
See also Lofton v. State, 416 So.2d 522, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (new arson statute § 806.01(l)(a) does not require showing of civil intent, only that willful act was done without a legitimate, lawful purpose). .
new arson statute § 806.01(l)(a) does not require showing of civil intent, only that willful act was done without a legitimate, lawful purpose