Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc. (2008)

green · 15 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Clark v. Matthews Intern. Corp. (2011)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 804 (Mo. Ct.App.2008).

green Clark v. Matthews International Corp. (2011)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Stanley v. Jer-Den Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 804 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).

green Hurt v. MFA Incorporated (2021)

Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.

Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) (recognizing that the “MHRA protects persons aged 40 to 70 from age discrimination”).

recognizing that the “MHRA protects persons aged 40 to 70 from age discrimination”

green Janet Hurst v. Kansas City, Missouri School District (2014)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

A “plaintiff can prove discrimination by showing age or any protected characteristics was a contributing factor for the employment action regardless if other factors also exist.” Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803-04 (Mo.App.W.D.2008) (internal quotation omitted).

green Janet Hurst v. Kansas City Missouri School District (2014)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

A "plaintiff can prove discrimination by showing age or any protected characteristics was a contributing factor for the employment action regardless if other factors also exist." Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803-04 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) (internal quotation omitted).

internal quotation omitted

green Claus v. Intrigue Hotels, LLC (2010)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

“MAI 31.24 sets out the elements necessary for a submissible case of age discrimination.” Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803 (Mo.App.

green George v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF ST. LOUIS (2010)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803 (Mo.App.2008).

green Ruppel v. City of Valley Park (2010)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

MAI 31.24 (6th Ed. Supp.2007); Daugherty, 231 S.W.3d at 820 ; Stanley v. Jerden Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803 (Mo.App.

green C.L. Clark v. AT&T Mobility Services, L.L.C. (2021)

Cited · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 803-04 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003).

green Kenneth Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln University, In Their Official Capacities, a/k/a Lincoln University (2016)

Cited (see also) · Mo. Ct. App. · signal: see also

Wireless Corp., 217 F.3d 46, 55 (1st Cir. 2000); see also Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 800, 804 (Mo.App.W.D. 2008) (“[Ajctions or remarks ... uttered by individuals closely involved in employment decisions may constitute direct evidence” of discrimination (quoting Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 552 (8th Cir. 2002))).

“[Ajctions or remarks ... uttered by individuals closely involved in employment decisions may constitute direct evidence” of discrimination (quoting Campos v. City of Blue Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 552 (8th Cir. 2002))

green Bravo, Alexandro Jordan (2015)

Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see

See Thompson, 263 S.W.3d at 800.