Apfel v. State (1983)

green · 19 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. Herbert (2014)

Rule Authority · W. Va. · 2 citations in this opinion

The majority failed to recognize that his status as a felon was a necessary element of the crime with which he was charged. 5 Contrary to the majority’s suggestion that state courts follow the “majority approach” with “very little analysis,” those courts have articulated sound reasoning for following the majority approach, which was recognized in Whitt, 220 W.Va. 685 , 649 S.E.2d 258 . 11 901, 904 (D.C. 2000) (“The law is clear that if a witness has declared unequivocally th…

recognizing trial court erred by permitting witness to testify in jury’s presence solely for purpose of invoking Fifth Amendment

green Gray v. State (2002)

Rule Authority · Md. · 2 citations in this opinion

United States v. Licavoli, 604 F.2d 613, 624 (9th Cir.1979); Bowles v. United States, 439 F.2d 536, 541-42 (D.C.Cir. 1970); People v. Fletcher, 193 Colo. 314, 316-17 , 566 P.2d 345, 347 (1977); Apfel v. State, 429 So.2d 85, 86-87 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983); State v. Cvetich, 73 Ill.App.3d 580, 584 , 29 Ill.Dec. 418 , 391 N.E.2d 1101, 1105 (1979); State v. Lashley, 233 Kan. 620, 625-27 , 664 P.2d 1358, 1364-65 (1983); People v. Dyer, 425 Mich. 572 , 390 N.W.2d 645 (1986); State v…

green A21-0583 State of Minnesota v. Larry Joe Foster, A21-0070, Court of Appeals Nonprecedential, ... (2024)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

App. 1986); State v. Eichstedt, 567 A.2d 1237, 1240 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989); Apfel v. State, 429 So. 2d 85, 86-87 (Fla. Dist.

green Laramee v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Apfel v. State, 429 So.2d 85, 86-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

green Bell v. State (1993)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Cir.1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 995 , 91 S.Ct. 1240 , 28 L.Ed.2d 533 (1971); Apfel v. State, 429 So.2d 85, 86-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Faver v. State, 393 So.2d 49, 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

green Carter v. State (1986)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Apfel v. State, 429 So.2d 85, 86-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Faver v. State, 393 So.2d 49, 50-51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

green MARCEL ASHLEY v. State (2020)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Apfel v. State, 429 So. 2d 85, 86 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (holding: “where the state, knowing that a witness will assert his right against self- incrimination, nevertheless calls that witness who is closely identified with the defendant or similarly implicated and the witness does in fact claim the privilege, the defendant is thereby prejudiced . . . .

green Wright v. State (1983)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See, Apfel v. State, 429 So.2d 85 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Faver v. State, 393 So.2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), and Deshler v. State, 298 So.2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).