Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom (1991)
green
· 105 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Stuhr v. Stuhr (1992)
As we have stated repeatedly: “[P]arties in a proceeding to dissolve a marriage cannot control the disposition of minor children by agreement.” Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579, 582 , 477 N.W.2d 8, 11 (1991).
green
Hoover v. Hoover (1993)
The Supreme Court has held that “parties to litigation are bound by stipulations voluntarily made and are granted relief therefrom only under exceptional circumstances.” Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579, 582 , 477 N.W.2d 8, 11 (1991).
green
Gatewood v. Powell (1993)
Based on a plain and ordinary reading of the unambiguous statute, see Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 *756 (1991), and giving a sensible reading to the statute as a whole, see State v. Garza, 242 Neb. 573 , 496 N.W.2d 448 (1993), we conclude that the 2-year provision of § 13-919(1) and (5) is inapplicable to this case.
green
Dice v. Dice (1992)
Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579, 590-91 , 477 N.W.2d 8, 16 (1991).
green
Weinand v. Weinand (2000)
See Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991).
green
Quintela v. Quintela (1996)
See, Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991); Austin v. Austin, 147 Neb. 109 , 22 N.W.2d 560 (1946); Cavanaugh v. deBaudiniere, supra. The Nebraska Supreme Court has held: “ ‘A person standing in loco parentis to a child is one who has put himself in the situation of a lawful parent by assuming the obligations incident to the parental relation, without going through the formalities necessary to a legal adoption, and the rights, duties, and liabilitie…
green
Beal v. Endsley (1995)
See, also, Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991).
green
Noland v. Yost (2023)
Accord State ex rel Storz v. Storz, 235 Neb. 368 , 455 N.W.2d 182 (1990) (holding district court where dissolution is properly filed has full and complete general jurisdiction over entire marital relationship and all related matters). 61 Hickenbottom, supra note 1 , 239 Neb. at 592 , 477 N.W.2d at 16-17 (“[a]lthough the in loco parentis status is not specifically enumerated as a requirement in [Neb.
green
State on Behalf of Hopkins v. Batt (1998)
See, Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991); Austin v. Austin, 147 Neb. 109 , 22 N.W.2d 560 (1946).
green
Evenson v. Evenson (1995)
Accord Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991).
green
Marriage of Simmons v. Simmons (1992)
See, e.g., Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8, 17 (1991) (former stepparent pursuing visitation with the former stepchild must establish that during the marriage, he or she acted as a parent to the child); Carter v. Brodrick, 644 P.2d 850, 855 (Alaska 1982) (“where a stepparent has assumed the status of in loco par-entis, a stepchild is a child of the marriage” within the meaning of the custody statute); Gribble v. Gribble, 583 P.2d 64, 66-67 (Utah 197…
green
State on Behalf of JR v. Mendoza (1992)
See Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991) (a stepfather has no duty to support a child after he divorces the child’s mother unless he maintains an “in loco parentis” relationship).
a stepfather has no duty to support a child after he divorces the child’s mother unless he maintains an “in loco parentis” relationship
green
Hansen v. Hansen (1992)
See, Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991); LeDoux v. LeDoux, 234 Neb. 479 , 452 *32 N.W.2d 1 (1990); Rice v. Rice, 231 Neb. 428 , 436 N.W.2d 518 (1989).