Poff v. State (2010)
green
· 8 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Rodrick Wimblery v. The State of Florida (2024)
Poff v. State, 41 So. 3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); see also Long v. State, 183 So. 3d 342, 345 (Fla. 2016) (“First, the evidence must not have been known by the trial court, the party, or counsel at the time of trial, and it must appear that the defendant or defense counsel could not have known of it by the use of diligence.
green
Johnny LaFlippe v. The State of Florida (2024)
In reaching this conclusion, the “post-conviction trial court must ‘consider all newly discovered evidence which would be admissible,’ and must ‘evaluate the weight of both the newly 3 discovered evidence and the evidence which was introduced at the trial.’” Poff v. State, 41 So. 3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (quoting Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911, 916 (Fla. 1991)).
quoting Jones v. State, 591 So. 2d 911, 916 (Fla. 1991)
green
Floyd v. State (2016)
Although an evidentiary hearing is not a prerequisite in making this determination, see, e.g., Poff v. State, 41 So.3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), “an eviden-tiary hearing is the general rule rather than the exception,” Rolack v. State, 93 So.3d 450, 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).
green
Brantley v. State (2011)
Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997); Poff v. State, 41 So.3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
green
Brantley v. State (2011)
Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997); Poff v. State, 41 So.3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
green
John v. State (2012)
See e.g., Poff v. State, 41 So.3d 1062 (Fla. Bd DCA 2010); Williams v. State, 876 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hough v. State, 679 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).