How cited: ARGYLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. v. Wolf · Go Syfert

ARGYLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. v. Wolf (2007)

green · 135 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 45 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Quote Authority · 5th Cir.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App. 2007) (“Unjust enrichment, itself, is not an independent cause of action . . . .”); Mowbray v. Avery, 76 S.W.3d 663, 679 (Tex. App. 2002).
“Unjust enrichment, itself, is not an independent cause of action . . . .”
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 6 citations in this opinion
Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co. , 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002); Walling , 863 S.W.2d at 58 ; Argyle ISD , 234 S.W.3d at 237.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002); Walling, 863 S.W.2d at 58 ; Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 237.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 551.041, .043 (West 2017); Wolf, 234 S.W.3d at 247.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); Fox v. Tropical Warehouses, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); Fox v. Tropical Warehouses, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); Fox v. Tropical Warehouses, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf , 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); Fox v. Tropical Warehouses, Inc ., 121 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); Lawry v. Pecan Plantation Owners Ass’n, Inc., No. 02-15-00079-CV, 2016 WL 4395777 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.); Hulen v. Hamilton, No. 02-06-00288-CV, 2008 WL 553812 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 28, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.); Friberg-Cooper Water Supply Corp. v. Elledge, 197 S.W.3d 826, 832 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 240 S.W.…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.)); accord Lawry v. Pecan Plantation Owners Ass’n, Inc., No. 02-15-00079-CV, 2016 WL 4395777 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.); Hulen v. Hamilton, No. 2-06-288- CV, 2008 WL 553812 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 28, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.); Friberg–Cooper Water Supply Corp. v. Elledge, 197 S.W.3d 826, 832 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 240…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Reyes, 272 S.W.3d at 592 ; City of Keller, 168 S.W.3d at 819-20 ; Jackson, 116 S.W.3d at 761 ; see also Vortt Exploration Co., 787 S.W.2d at 944 ; Wolf, 234 S.W.3d at 246-47.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Quote Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229 , 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.); see also DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 686 (Tex. 1990) (“An injunction plaintiff need not establish the correctness of his claim to obtain temporary relief, but must show only a likelihood of success on the merits.”).
“An injunction plaintiff need not establish the correctness of his claim to obtain temporary relief, but must show only a likelihood of success on the merits.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (citations omitted); see also Hulen v. Hamilton, No. 02-06-00288-CV, 2008 WL 553812 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 28, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating same); Friberg-Cooper Water Supply Corp. v. 3 Also, we have scrutinized the record here, and contrary to Davis’s contentions, there is no competent summary judgment evidence to raise a fact issue with regard to whether OneWest knew of Davi…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 242 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (“The court, not the jury, determines whether the exception applies.”).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.). 24 .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.). 12 and made improvements on the property, and Stockhome did not stop it from doing so.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 247 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
green in Re Tommie L. Jones (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf , 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (same); Carone v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 138 S.W.3d 1, 10 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied) (“Fraudulent concealment . . . is not an independent cause of action.”).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Butnaru , 84 S.W.3d at 204 ; Argyle ISD , 234 S.W.3d at 236.
green Hamilton v. Pechacek (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Butnaru, 84 S.W.3d at 204 ; Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 236.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 237 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf , 234 S.W.3d 229, 237 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 237 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 246 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (same); Carone v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 138 S.W.3d 1, 10 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied) (“Fraudulent concealment . . . is not an independent cause of action.”).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.). 9 Tuscany Realty with sufficient financial documentation and that it appeared to her that the partnership had perpetuated some sort of tax fraud.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trs. v. Wolf , 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.). 22: The partnership agreement provided that the costs of an audit would be borne by the auditing party.
Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.
Wolf, 234 S.W.3d at 247; see also Fortune Prod.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf , 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Bd. of Trustees v. Wolf, 234 S.W.3d 229, 241 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See 234 S.W.3d 229 , 248-49 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See 234 S.W.3d 229 , 248-49 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See 234 S.W.3d 229 , 248-49 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See 234 S.W.3d 229 , 248-49 (Tex.App. -- Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 246-47 fees in that motion, then it asserted that Dudley (unjust enrichment doctrine applies principles of restitution Construction's conspiracy claim " was groundless, was to disputes where there is no actual contract). brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment." The motion sought recovery of all of the Appellees' Additionally, the availability of an adequate legal attorney's fees.
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See 234 S.W.3d 229 , 248-49 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 246-47 (unjust enrichment doctrine applies principles of restitution to disputes where there is no actual contract).
unjust enrichment doctrine applies principles of restitution to disputes where there is no actual contract
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 236; Fox, 121 S.W.3d at 857 .
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 236; Fox, 121 S.W.3d at 857 .
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Argyle ISD, 234 S.W.3d at 246-47 (unjust enrichment doctrine applies principles of restitution to disputes where there is no actual contract).
unjust enrichment doctrine applies principles of restitution to disputes where there is no actual contract