Arrowood v. State (2003)

green · 13 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Nisbany Surit-Garcias v. State of Florida (2024)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Arrowood v. State, 843 So. 2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

green State v. Fleming (2011)

Rule Authority · Fla. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cf. Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (stating, "[t]he jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points”).

stating, "[t]he jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points”

green Marlena Christine Woods v. State of Florida (2016)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Arrowood v. State, 843 So. 2d 940, 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

green Nelson v. Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corrections (2009)

Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.

In Florida, “[t]he jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points.” Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

green MacK v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

See, e.g., Gisi v. State, 848 So.2d 1278, 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ("Although the Apprendi issue was not raised at sentencing by trial counsel, appellate counsel could have preserved the issue for appellate review by filing a motion to correct a sentencing error in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2)."); Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941-42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (reversing because appellant was entitled to relief under Apprendi when th…

reversing because appellant was entitled to relief under Apprendi when the claim was raised during the pendency of the appeal in a Rule 3.800(b)(2) motion

green Plummer v. State (2006)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“The jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points.”).

“The jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points.”

green Fleming v. State (2006)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (stating, “[t]he jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points”).

stating, “[t]he jury’s findings of DUI manslaughter and DUI serious bodily injuries support the imposition of the death and severe victim injury points”

green Plasencia v. State (2015)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).” The post-conviction court found that Mr. Plasencia had not been sentenced beyond the statutory maximum and so Apprendi did not apply.

green Lopez v. State (2004)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Arrowood, v. State, 843 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (observing that a jury’s finding of DUI with serious bodily injuries supports the imposition of severe victim injury points).

observing that a jury’s finding of DUI with serious bodily injuries supports the imposition of severe victim injury points

green Gisi v. State (2003)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Arrowood v. State, 843 So.2d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).