How cited: People v. Carter · Go Syfert

People v. Carter (2002)

green · 52 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
Kazmierczak, 461 Mich at 418 ; People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 515, 517-518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
Kazmierczak, 461 Mich at 418 ; People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 515, 517-518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 515, 517-518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).
green Myers v. State (2005)
Rule Authority · Ind.
These cases base ready mobility not on the immediate capabilities of an automobile but rather its inherent capabilities Seq, e.g., United States v. Watts, 329 F.3d 1282, 1286 (11th Cir.2003) ("All that is necessary to satisfy [the readily mobile] element is that the automobile is operational."); United States v. Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir.2002) (holding that the automobile exception applied to a car that had broken down and was to be repaired during the night and…
green People v. Wilson (2003)
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 515, 517-518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 521 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002); Russell, 174 Mich App at 365 .
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See People v Carter, 250 Mich App 510, 515-518 ; 655 NW2d 236 (2002).