How cited: People v. Thivierge · Go Syfert

People v. Thivierge (1988)

green · 14 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green State v. Hempele (1990)
Rule Authority · N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F. 2d 1432, 1437 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Michaels, 726 F.2d 1307, 1312-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 820 , 105 S.Ct. 92 , 83 L.Ed.2d 38 (1984); United States v. Kramer, supra, 711 F.2d at 791-94 ; United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d 299, 308-09 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 931 , 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); United States v. Reicherter, supra, 647 F.2d at 399 ; United States v. Vahalik, supra, 606 …
green Com. v. Williams, S. (2025)
Rule Authority · Pa. Super. Ct.
See also Beltz v. State, 221 P.3d 328 (Alaska 2009) (adopting Litchfield analysis and noting that “a garbage search is a sufficiently minimal intrusion on privacy expectations to require only reasonable suspicion that the trash contains evidence of a crime causing serious harm to persons or property”). - 45 - J-A11038-25 545, 549-50 (Utah Ct. App. 1997), cert denied, 945 P.2d 1118 (Utah 1997); People v. Thivierge, 435 N.W.2d 446, 447 (Mich.App. 1988), appeal denied (May 31, …
Rule Authority · Iowa
Ct. App. 2003) (holding the search of defendant’s garbage was reasonable based on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Greenwood that “persons have no reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage”); State v. Sampson, 765 A.2d 629, 636 (Md. 2001) (holding the Fourth Amendment does not protect “trash [that] is placed for collection at a place that is readily accessible, and thus exposed, to the public, [because] the person has relinquished any reasonable expectation of…
per curiam
Rule Authority · Iowa
Ct. App. 2003) (holding the search of defendant’s garbage was reasonable based on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Greenwood that “persons have no reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage”); State v. Sampson, 765 A.2d 629, 636 (Md. 2001) (holding the Fourth Amendment does not protect “trash [that] is placed for collection at a place that is readily accessible, and thus exposed, to the public, [because] the person has relinquished any reasonable expectation of…
per curiam
Rule Authority · Iowa
Ct. App. 2003) (holding the search of defendant’s garbage was reasonable based on the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Greenwood that “persons have no reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage”); State v. Sampson, 765 A.2d 629, 636 (Md. 2001) (holding the Fourth Amendment does not protect “trash [that] is placed for collection at a place that is readily accessible, and thus exposed, to the public, [because] the person has relinquished any reasonable expectation of…
per curiam