Moore v. Trevino (1992)

green · 16 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER and STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER v. FIRST AMERICAN BANK, etc. (2022)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“When an award of relief is not sought by the pleadings, it is error to grant such relief.” Moore v. Trevino, 612 So. 2d 604, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

green Russell v. Pasik (2015)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

See, e.g., Von Eiff, 720 So. 2d at 514-15 ; Wakeman, 921 So. 2d at 673 ; Kazmierazak, 736 So. 2d at 110 ; Music, 654 So. 2d at 1235 ; Taylor v. Kennedy, 649 So. 2d 270, 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Moore v. Trevino, 612 So. 2d 604, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); see also Swain v. Swain, 567 So. 2d 1058, 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) ("There is no such thing [as a psychological parent] recognized in law.

green Russell v. Pasik (2015)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

See, e.g., Von Eiff, 720 So.2d at 514 - 15; Wakeman, 921 So.2d at 673 ; Kazmierazak, 736 So.2d at 110; Music, 654 So.2d at 1235 ; Taylor v. Kennedy, 649 So.2d 270, 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Moore v. Trevino, 612 So.2d 604, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); see also Swain v. Swain, 567 So.2d 1058, 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“There is no such thing [as a psychological parent] recognized in law.

green Smith v. Smith (2007)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

P. 1.110(b) (requiring a pleading that sets forth a claim for relief to state a cause of action and to contain a short, plain statement of ultimate facts showing the pleader is entitled to relief and a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader allegedly is entitled); Moore v. Trevino, 612 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Rhodes v. Wall, 514 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (reversing award of shared parental responsibility, where former husband never sough…

green Youmans v. Ramos (1999)

Rule Authority · Mass.

Ct. App. 1995) (affirming denial of visitation rights, despite contention that visitation would be in child’s best interest, where there is no statutory authority or other authority granting court with jurisdiction to order such visitation rights); Moore v. Trevino, 612 So. 2d 604, 608-609 (Fla. Dist.

holding that court erred in granting child’s paternal aunts visitation rights where no authority provided such rights, and where mother objected

green Wakeman v. Dixon (2006)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

Swain v. Swain, 567 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); see also Moore v. Trevino, 612 So.2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Wills v. Wills, 399 So.2d 1130, 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (Moore, J. dissenting) (and cases cited therein).

green McDonald v. McDonald (1999)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Moore v. Trevino, 612 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (the trial court's award of shared parental responsibility constituted reversible error, where appellee did not pray for custody in his counter petition); Wallace v. Wallace, 605 So.2d 504, 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (because the wife's motion did not request the relief awarded, and she submitted no evidence on the issue, it was error to award such relief); Rhodes v. Wall, 514 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (rever…

the trial court's award of shared parental responsibility constituted reversible error, where appellee did not pray for custody in his counter petition

green Taylor v. Kennedy (1994)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also