How cited: In Interest of DW · Go Syfert

In Interest of DW (1986)

green · 119 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 50
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green In the Interest of V.L., Minor Child (2018)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986).
green In Re Carrington H. (2016)
Rule Authority · Tenn. · 3 citations in this opinion
C.H., 166 P.3d 288 , 290 (Colo.App.2007); State v. Anonymous, 179 Conn. 155 , 425 A.2d 939, 943 (1979); In re R.E.S., 978 A.2d at 189 ; J.B. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children and Families, 170 So.3d 780, 790 (Fla.2015); In re A.R.A.S., 278 Ga.App. 608 , 629 S.E.2d 822 , 825 (2006); In re RGB, 229 P.3d 1066 , 1090 (Haw.2010); In re M.F., 326 Ill.App.3d 1110 , 261 Ill.Dec. 132 , 762 N.E.2d 701 , 709 (2002); In re A.R.S., 480 N.W.2d 888, 891 (Iowa 1992) (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 5…
green Michael George Hatfield v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2026)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The movant must show that the newly discovered evidence (1) could not, “in the exercise of due diligence, have been discovered prior to the conclusion of the trial;” (2) “is material and not merely cumulative or 3 By definition, “newly discovered evidence” must not have been “produced at trial.” In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of C.J.P., Minor Child, D.P., Mother, J.E., Father (2016)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cf. In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986) (considering chapter 232 termination). 5 for termination has the burden to show the other parent has abandoned the child.
considering chapter 232 termination
green Brice v. Denton (2004)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
M.M., 2003 UT 54 , ¶ 13, 82 P.3d 1104 , 1106 (Utah 2003); In re M.B., 162 Vt. 229 , 647 A.2d 1001 , 1003 n. 3 (1994); e.g., Davis v. Div. of Family Servs., 788 A.2d 527 , 527 (Del.Supr.2001) (order); In re M.T.P., 101 Idaho 280 , 611 P.2d 1065, 1066-67 (1980); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986); see also In re C.D.M., 888 S.W.2d 725, 728 (Mo.Ct.
green Benson v. Richardson (1995)
Rule Authority · Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of J.P. (1993)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
They must not be made to await their mother’s maturity.’ ” In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110-11 (Iowa 1975)).
quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110-11 (Iowa 1975)
green State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Geist (1989)
Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
W., 385 NW2d 570, 580 (Iowa 1986); In Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan App 2d 541, 684 P2d 445 (1984); In re Mosely, 34 Wash App 179, 660 P2d 315 (1983); but see In Re Stephen, 401 Mass 144, 514 NE2d 1087 (1987) (holding that, “[a]bsent exceptional circumstances, we do not review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time on appeal.”) Unquestionably, the majority has unearthed legitimate institutional concerns about hearing claims of ineffective counsel on dire…
green In the Interest of J.P.B. (1988)
Rule Authority · Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion
See Iowa Code §§ 232.116 (5)(c), 232.102(4); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 573-74 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of L.C., M.C., R.C., and L.C., Minor Children (2026)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green In the Interest of J.R., Minor Child (2024)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703, 707 (Iowa 2010) (“We do not ‘gamble with the children’s future’ by asking them to continuously wait for a stable biological parent . . . .” (quoting In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986))).
green In the Interest of B.B., Minor Child (2023)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)); see also In re L.L., 459 N.W.2d 489, 495 (Iowa 1990) (“Children simply cannot wait for responsible parenting.
quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)
green In the Interest of R.G., Minor Child (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
Our court has held that although the Sixth Amendment does not apply to termination cases, “due process requires counsel appointed under a statutory directive to render 9 effective assistance.” In re B.N., No. 00-0220, 2001 WL 57987 , at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 24, 2001) (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986)).
green In the Interest of R.G., Minor Child (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
Our court has held that although the Sixth Amendment does not apply to termination cases, “due process requires counsel appointed under a statutory directive to render 9 effective assistance.” In re B.N., No. 00-0220, 2001 WL 57987 , at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 24, 2001) (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986)).
green In the Interest of K.D. and K.D., Minor Children (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
To the extent the mother raises ineffective-assistance issues, our review will follow the same two-part test applied in criminal cases.3 In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986); e.g., B.G., 2020 WL 7022392 , at *2–3.
green In the Interest of S.H., Minor Child (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the parent must “show (1) that counsel’s performance was deficient, and (2) that actual prejudice resulted.” In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green Billy Dean Carter, Bill G. Carter, and the Estate of Shirley D. Carter, by and through Bill G. Carter v. Jaso… (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa
Benson v. Richardson, 537 N.W.2d 748, 762 (Iowa 1995) (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986)). “[T]he term ‘newly discovered evidence’ refers to facts existing at trial time of which the aggrieved party was then excusably ignorant.” Wilkes v. Iowa State Highway Comm’n, 186 N.W.2d 604, 607 (Iowa 1971).
green In the Interest of D.H. and J.H., Minor Children (2021)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)); see also In re D.W., 791 N.W.2d 703 , 707–08 (Iowa 2010); In re L.L., 459 N.W.2d 489, 495 (Iowa 1990) (“Children simply cannot wait for responsible parenting.
quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)
green In the Interest of B.G., Minor Child (2020)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of L.C., A.S., and V.F., Minor Children (2020)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
“As no 10 Sixth Amendment protections are implicated, there is no constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.” Id. (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986)).
green In the Interest of K.C., Minor Child (2019)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App. · signal: cf.
Cf. In re J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387, 390 (Iowa 1988) (considering chapter 232 termination) In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986); In re D.P., 465 N.W.2d 313, 316 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990). 7 does not excuse P.C.’s conscious choice to not attempt to find K.C.
green In the Interest of K.A., K.M., and K.P., Minor Children (2019)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
“We do not ‘gamble with the children’s future’ by asking them to continuously wait for a stable biological parent . . . .” Id. (quoting In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986)).
green In the Interest of M.W., Minor Child (2019)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 583 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of J.R., D.R., and H.R., Minor Children (2019)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
See Strickland v. Washintgon, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 580 (Iowa 1986).
green In re K.J., R.J., & A.J. (2018)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
Ineffective Assistance In In re D.W., the Iowa Supreme Court assumed “due process requires counsel appointed under a statutory directive to provide effective assistance.” 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In Re: Carrington H. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part (2016)
Rule Authority · Tenn.
App. Ct. 2002); In re A.R.S., 480 N.W.2d 888, 891 (Iowa 1992) (citing In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986)); In re Rushing, 684 P.2d 445, 448-49 (Kan.
green In the Interest of W.O.-p., Minor Child, A.O., Mother, L.P., Father (2015)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re C.M., 652 N.W.2d 204, 209 (Iowa 2002). “[D]ue process requires counsel appointed under statutory directive to provide effective assistance.” In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of M.L., Minor Child, M.L., Minor Child (2015)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
See In re J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387, 390 (Iowa 1988); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986); In re D.P., 465 N.W.2d 313, 316 (Iowa Ct.App.1990).
green In the Interest of N.L.-s., A.L.-s., I.L.-s., I.L.-s., D.L.-s., and D.L.-t., Minor Children, G.s, Father, D.L… (2015)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green In The Interest Of D.W., Minor Child, A.M.W., Mother (2010)
Rule Authority · Iowa
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)); see also In re L.L., 459 N.W.2d 489, 495 (Iowa 1990) (“Children simply cannot wait for responsible parenting.
quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110 (Iowa 1975)
green In the Interest of RGB (2010)
Quote Authority · Haw.
(Citing Strickland [].))); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 , 700-01 (1988) (“[W]hether respondent shall prevail on her claim that she was deprived of her right to the effective assistance of counsel is guided by the standards set out in Strickland [], and adopted by our supreme court in People v. Albanese[, 104 Ill.2d 504 , 85 Ill.Dec. 441 ,] 473 N.E.2d 1246 [, 1255 (Ill.1984) ].”); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986) (“Although the …
“Although the sixth amendment is not implicated here, we nonetheless will apply the same standards adopted for counsel appointed in a criminal proceeding.”
green In Re Rgb (2010)
Quote Authority · Haw.
(Citing Strickland [].))); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 , 700-01 (1988) ("[W]hether respondent shall prevail on her claim that she was deprived of her right to the effective assistance of counsel is guided by the standards set out in Strickland [], and adopted by our supreme court in People v. Albanese [, 104 Ill.2d 504 , 85 Ill.Dec. 441 ,] 473 N.E.2d 1246 [, 1255 (Ill.1984)]."); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986) ("Although the …
"Although the sixth amendment is not implicated here, we nonetheless will apply the same standards adopted for counsel appointed in a criminal proceeding."
green In Re Adoption/Guardianship of Chaden M. (2009)
Rule Authority · Md. Ct. Spec. App.
Compare, e.g., Jones v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 361 Ark. 164 , 205 S.W.3d 778, 794 (2005) (concluding that right to counsel in termination proceedings includes right to effective assistance of counsel and adopting the Strickland standard for ineffectiveness); People in Interest of V.M.R., 768 P.2d 1268, 1270 (Colo.App.1989) (concluding that Strickland applies to termination proceedings); In the Interest of A.H.P., 232 Ga.App. 330 , 500 S.E.2d 418, 421-422 (1998) (rec…
assuming that due process requires effective assistance of counsel in termination proceeding and applying same standards otherwise applicable in criminal actions
green In Re JL (2009)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
See also Iowa Code § 232.2 (22) (defining a guardian ad litem as "a person appointed by the court to represent the interest of a child in any judicial proceedings to which the child is a party"); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986) (stating due process requires that counsel appointed pursuant to a statute provide effective assistance).
stating due process requires that counsel appointed pursuant to a statute provide effective assistance
green In the Interest of J.L. (2009)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
See also Iowa Code § 232.2 (22) (defining a guardian ad litem as “a person appointed by the court to represent the interest of a child in any judicial proceedings to which the child is a party"); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986) (stating due process requires that counsel appointed pursuant to a statute provide effective assistance).
stating due process requires that counsel appointed pursuant to a statute provide effective assistance
green In the interest of T.P. (2008)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In Re TP (2008)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of S.D. (2003)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579-80 (Iowa 1986).
green In Re SD (2003)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579-80 (Iowa 1986).
green In Re MS (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex.
P. 324(b)(2); Cecil v. Smith, 804 S.W.2d 509, 510-11 (Tex.1991). [26] Tex. Fam.Code § 107.013(a)(1). [27] See In re K.L., 91 S.W.3d 1 , 11 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.); In re B.L.D., 56 S.W.3d 203, 211-12 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001), rev'd on other grounds, 113 S.W.3d 340 , 2003 WL 21512622 (Tex.2003); In re J.M.S., 43 S.W.3d 60, 63 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.); In re B.B., 971 S.W.2d 160, 172 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1998, pet. denied); Arteaga v. Tex. Dep't of Pr…
green In the Interest of M.S. (2003)
Rule Authority · Tex.
See, e.g., Ex parte E.D., 777 So.2d 113, 115 (Ala.2000); State v. Anonymous, 179 Conn. 155 , 425 A.2d 939, 942-43 (1979); In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (1986); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087, 1090-91 (1987); In re Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65, 66 (1986); In re G.L.H., 614 N.W.2d 718, 720 (Minn.2000); In re D.D.F., 801 P.2d 703, 706-07 (Okla.1990); In re Geist, 310 Or. 176 , 796 P.2d 1193 , 1201 n. 12 (1990); In re E.H., 880 P.2d 11, 13 (Uta…
green In the Interest of K.L. (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Oct. 11, 2002); Lawson v. Reynolds, 2002 WL 1486484 , *6 (Alaska-July 10, 2002); In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4942, 142 Ariz. 240 , 689 P.2d 183, 185 (Ct.App.1984); In re Kristin H., 46 Cal.App.4th 1635 , 54 Cal.Rptr.2d 722 , 736-41 (1996); State v. Anonymous, 179 Conn. 155 , 425 A.2d 939, 942-43 (1979); L.W. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 812 So.2d 551, 554-56 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2002); In re A.H.P., 232 Ga.App. 330 , 500 S.E.2d 418, 421-22 (1998)…
green In Re KL (2002)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Oct. 11, 2002); Lawson v. Reynolds, 2002 WL 1486484 , *6 (Alaska July 10, 2002); In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4942, 142 Ariz. 240 , 689 P.2d 183, 185 (Ct.App.1984); In re Kristin H., 46 Cal.App.4th 1635 , 54 Cal.Rptr.2d 722 , 736-41 (1996); State v. Anonymous, 179 Conn. 155 , 425 A.2d 939, 942-43 (1979); L.W. v. Dep't of Children and Families, 812 So.2d 551, 554-56 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2002); In re A.H.P., 232 Ga.App. 330 , 500 S.E.2d 418, 421-22 (1998)…
green In Re CB (2000)
Quote Authority · Iowa · signal: see also
As we noted in A.C., "[t]he crucial days of childhood cannot be suspended while parents experiment with ways to face up to their own problems." A.C., 415 N.W.2d at 613 ; see also In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) ("we cannot gamble with the children's future[, t]hey must not be made to await their mother's maturity").
"we cannot gamble with the children's future[, t]hey must not be made to await their mother's maturity"
green In the Interest of C.B. (2000)
Quote Authority · Iowa · signal: see also
As we noted in AC., “[t]he crucial days of childhood cannot be suspended while parents experiment with ways to face up to. their own problems.” AC., 415 N.W.2d at 613 ; see also In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (“we cannot gamble with the children’s future[, t]hey must not be made to await their mother’s maturity”).
“we cannot gamble with the children’s future[, t]hey must not be made to await their mother’s maturity”
green In the Interest of R.L. (1995)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
They must not be made to await their mother’s maturity.” In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986) (quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110-11 (Iowa 1975)). *904 The record reveals, in this case, the best interests of the children require termination of parental rights rather than long-term foster care.
quoting In re Kester, 228 N.W.2d 107, 110-11 (Iowa 1975)
green In the Interest of A.R.S. (1992)
Rule Authority · Iowa
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of J.V. (1991)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In In re J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387, 390 (Iowa 1988), and In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 579 (Iowa 1986), the Iowa Supreme Court applied the principles of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), in considering the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel in a proceeding to terminate parental rights.
green In the Interest of D.P. (1990)
Rule Authority · Iowa Ct. App.
In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 573 (Iowa 1986).
green In the Interest of E.B., Minor Child (2023)
Cited · Iowa Ct. App. · signal: see
See In re D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570, 578 (Iowa 1986).