Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole (1983)
green
· 62 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Fiore v. Hilliker (2015)
Id. at 834.
green
Fiore v. Hilliker (2015)
Id. at 834.
See Steenes v. MAC Property Management, LLC, 2014 IL App (1st) 120719, ¶ 18 (“Where the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be given effect as written, and under those circumstances, the meaning of the contract is a question of law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)). ¶ 37 In support of the argument that the parties to the use agreement could contractually adopt a new rule that did not apply “retroactively” the Board cites one case from a foreign juri…
See Steenes v. MAC Property Management, LLC, 2014 IL App (1st) 120719, ¶ 18 (“Where the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be given effect as written, and under those circumstances, the meaning of the contract is a question of law.”). ¶ 38 In support of the argument that the parties to the use agreement could contractually adopt a new rule that did not apply “retroactively” the Board cites one case from a foreign jurisdiction: Angora Enterprises v. Cole…
In Angora Enters., Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 834 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), the supreme court held that where the declaration of condominium expressly incorporated the Condominium Act and any amendments, such language encompassed the amendment declaring escalation clauses in recreation or land leases void and unenforceable.
In Angora Enters., Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 834 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), the supreme court held that where the declaration of condominium expressly incorporated the Condominium Act and any amendments, such language encompassed the amendment declaring escalation clauses in recreation or land leases void and unenforceable.
green
Buy Direct Jewelers Co. v. R.A. Brandon & Co. (1990)
Angora Enters. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 835 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Hartford Fire Ins.
Because the lease expressly adopted any statutory amendment which would extend the term of enforceability of the lease, the 1984 statute is the one applicable here. [1] See Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 834 (Fla. 1983) (contract will be enforced where parties intended to be bound by future amendments to the condominium act), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
contract will be enforced where parties intended to be bound by future amendments to the condominium act
The focus, then, is whether the parties expressly consented to the incorporation of D.C.Code § 45-1853(c) into the terms of their agreement “by virtue of the language in the [condominium instruments].” Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 834 (Fla.1983).
green
Beeman v. Island Breakers (1990)
See Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
See Angora Enters., Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1983).
green
Plaza Towers N. Condo v. Plaza Rec. Dev. (1987)
See Angora Enterprises v. Cole, 439 So.2d 832, 835 (Fla. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927 , 104 S.Ct. 1710 , 80 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), and Association of Golden Glades, Condo.
See Angora Enterprises, Inc. v. Cole, 439 So.2d at 834 .