Walsh v. State (1982)
green
· 34 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Maharaj does not argue that he was prevented at trial from introducing the examiner’s opinion; indeed, Florida law prohibits the introduction of polygraph results absent the consent of both parties, see Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla.1982), and the trial judge in this case specifically prohibited the witness from making any mention of the polygraph in the course of his testimony.
green
& SC15-2005 Nelson Serrano v. State of Florida and Nelson Serrano v. Julie L. Jones, etc. (2017)
See Duest v. State, 12 So. 3d 734, 746 (Fla. 2009); Walsh v. State, 418 So. 2d 1000, 1002 (Fla. 1982) (“[P]olygraph evidence is inadmissible in an adversary proceeding in this state.”).
“[P]olygraph evidence is inadmissible in an adversary proceeding in this state.”
green
Gosciminski v. State (2013)
See Duest v. State, 12 So.3d 734, 746 (Fla.2009); Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla.1982) (“[P]olygraph evidence is inadmissible in an adversary proceeding in this state.”).
green
Rosa v. State (2010)
Cf. Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla.1982).
green
Smith v. State (2006)
See Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 787 (Fla. 2004) ("As for the polygraph tests, their results would not have been admissible at trial without the consent of both parties."); Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla. 1982).
green
Ramirez v. State (1995)
See, e.g., Ramos v. State, 496 So.2d 121, 123 (Fla. 1986) (testimony of dog-handler and police officer insufficient, by itself, to establish reliability of dog scent-discrimination lineups); Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9, 18 (Fla. 1985) (hypnotically refreshed testimony per se inadmissible), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894 , 107 S.Ct. 295 , 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986), modified Morgan v. State, 537 So.2d 973 (Fla. 1989) (defendant's refreshed testimony may be admissible); Walsh v. State,…
"[P]olygraph evidence is inadmissible in an adversary proceeding in this state."
green
Wright v. State (1992)
Prior to the amendment of rule 3.390 in 1985, we held that a penalty instruction was not required at the end of the guilt phase because “the jury in a death case clearly knows the maximum and minimum penalties.” Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1003 (Fla.1982).
green
Craig v. State (1987)
Although vote counts by which juries have recommended death or life imprisonment have been referred to by this Court in opinions deciding capital sentencing cases, e.g., Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1003 (Fla. 1982); Raulerson v. State, 358 So.2d 826, 831 (Fla.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 959 , 99 S.Ct. 364 , 58 L.Ed.2d 352 (1978), the margin by which a jury recommends life imprisonment has no relevance to the question of whether such recommendation should be followed.
green
Barclay v. Florida (1983)
See Walsh v. State, 418 So. 2d 1000, 1003-1004 (1982) (listing 23 such cases).
listing 23 such cases
green
Michael T. Rivera v. State of Florida (2015)
See Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla. 1982). 10 .
green
Sochor v. State (2004)
See Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000, 1002 (Fla.1982).
green
Salter v. State (2001)
“The appellant had no constitutional right, overriding the public interest, to have his case determined by a tribunal whose processes he had himself thus frustrated and abused.” Id. at 344 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000 , 1002-03 (Fla.1982) (mistrial upheld on the basis of manifest necessity where defendant violated an order in limine and testified that he had passed a lie detector test).
green
Hawkins v. State (1983)
See also Walsh v. State, 418 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 1982), and cases cited therein.