How cited: La Rocca v. State · Go Syfert

La Rocca v. State (1981)

green · 12 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See Allah v. State, 471 So.2d 121, 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (party that elicits testimony on cross-examination cannot complain when adverse party elicits same testimony or explores. the subject of the testimony); City of Miami Beach v. Klein, 414 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); La Rocca v. State, 401 So.2d 866, 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
green McGriff v. State (1986)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Kennedy v. State, 455 So.2d 351, 353 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1197 , 105 S.Ct. 981 , 83 L.Ed.2d 983 (1985); Paramore v. State, 229 So.2d 855, 858-59 (Fla. 1969), modified *1298 on other grounds, 408 U.S. 935 , 92 S.Ct. 2857 , 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972); Rubasky v. State, 401 So.2d 894 (Fla. 5th DCA), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 524 , 70 L.Ed.2d 393 (1981); La Rocca v. State, 401 So.2d 866, 867-68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Presley, 389 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla.…
green Bush v. State (1984)
Rule Authority · Fla.
On this point, the instant case is essentially similar to La Rocca v. State, 401 So.2d 866, 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), where police statements that minimized the defendant's action were held not to be coercive.
green Everett v. State (2004)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See La Rocca v. State, 401 So.2d 866, 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (holding that the mention of a polygraph examination does not compel reversal where the evidence was introduced by the defendant).
holding that the mention of a polygraph examination does not compel reversal where the evidence was introduced by the defendant
green Alonso v. State (2002)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See La Rocca v. State, 401 So.2d 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).