How cited: Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry · Go Syfert

Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry (2007)

green · 43 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn. 2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. · 4 citations in this opinion
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 725-26 (Minn. 2007) (discussing that cost containment under the Act is a legitimate legislative objective); Schmidt v. Modern Metals Foundry, Inc., 424 N.W.2d 538, 541-42 (Minn.1988). 3 The Legislature has significant authority to amend the Act as it sees fit.
discussing that cost containment under the Act is a legitimate legislative objective
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gluba, 735 N.W.2d at 721 (quotations omitted).
quotations omitted
Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn. 2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn. 2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 721-23 (Minn.2007) (stating, in a constitutional challenge to a workers’ compensation statute, "We have consistently concluded that it is proper to defer to the legislature in matters concerning the desirability of statutory classifications affecting the regulation of economic activity and the distribution of economic benefits” (quotations omitted)).
Rule Authority · Minn.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry also recognized that the permanent-partial-disability rating thresholds in subdivision 5(2) are not directly related to employability. 735 N.W.2d 713, 725 (Minn.2007) (recognizing that the Legislature reasonably could have believed that employees with high permanent-partial-disability ratings are more likely to be permanently and totally disabled than employees with lower permanent-partial-disability ratings, even though the ratings “are poor …
Rule Authority · Minn.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 720-21 (Minn.2007).
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713, 719 (Minn.2007).
green State v. Cox (2011)
Rule Authority · Minn.
Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, we articulated the test for workers’ compensation statutes as follows: " 'To survive [an equal protection] challenge, a [workers’ compensation] classification must apply uniformly to all those similarly situated; be necessitated by genuine and substantial distinctions between the two groups; and effectuate the purpose of the law.’ ” 735 N.W.2d 713, 721 (Minn.2007) (quoting Bituminous Cas.
Cited · Mo. · signal: see
See Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry, 735 N.W.2d 713 (Minn.2007)("the legislature could take many steps to reduce employers' costs, but if these steps resulted in the denial of benefits to a sufficiently large proportion of workers ... the workers’ compensation scheme no longer would represent a reasonable trade off of workers’ common law rights”); Judd v. Drezga, 103 P.3d 135, 139 (Utah 2004) (the constitutional right to a remedy is satisfied "if the law provides and injured…