Metro Renovation, Inc. v. State Department of Labor (1996)
green
· 57 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Co., 158 Me. at 418 , 185 A.2d 442 . [¶ 37] Several other states have declined to call a construction jobsite a “place of business” within the meaning of part B of the ABC test because it “precludes any construction company from ever meeting the requirements of [the ABC test] with regard to tradespeople hired for construction work.” See Metro Renovation, Inc. v. State Dep’t of Labor, 249 Neb. 337 , 543 N.W.2d 715, 722 (1996), disapproved on other grounds by State v. Nelson, …
green
Larsen v. D B Feedyards, Inc. (2002)
“A fundamental element of Anglo-American jurisprudence is the principle that the law should be stable, fostering both equality and predictability of treatment.” Metro Renovation v. State, 249 Neb. 337, 349 , 543 N.W.2d 715, 724 (1996) (Connolly, J., concurring in result).
Connolly, J., concurring in result
green
State v. Nichols (1999)
See Metro Renovation v. State, 249 Neb. 337 , 543 N.W.2d 715 (1996) (Connolly, J., concurring in the result) (citing State v. Menzies, 889 P.2d 393 (Utah 1994), and Barstow v. State, 742 S.W.2d 495 (Tex. App. 1987)).
green
United States v. Wheeler (1999)
See Metro Renovation Inc. v. State of Nebraska Department of Labor, 249 Neb. 337, 343 , 543 N.W.2d 715, 721 (1996) (per curiam) (opinions of the then recently created Court of Appeals do not constitute binding precedent that must be followed by the district and county courts).