CH v. State (1989)

green · 7 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Dobson v. State (1999)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

If the Legislature has determined that a pocketknife is not a weapon, then when the officer identified the oval object he felt as being a "possible" pocketknife only 2-3 inches in length, he did not have a reasonable belief that defendant was armed with a "dangerous weapon." See C.H. v. State, 548 So.2d 895, 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)(although presence of bulge in pocket may have given rise to reasonable suspicion to conduct pat down, that suspicion disappeared when officer dete…

although presence of bulge in pocket may have given rise to reasonable suspicion to conduct pat down, that suspicion disappeared when officer determined that object was a cigarette case

green R.R. v. State (2002)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See also C.H. v. State, 548 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

green Harford v. State (2002)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See M.A.P. v. State, 403 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (officer did not believe paper bag contained a weapon); Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (officer did not think cigarette package contained a weapon); Lencsak v. State, 579 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (no evidence that the officer had a reasonable suspicion that a paper bag contained a weapon); see also, In the Interest of J.B., 632 So.2d 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (trial court erred in failing to sup…

green In the Interest of J.B. (1994)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See C.H. v. State, 548 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).