Halverson v. Tydrich (1990)
green
· 74 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Pagoudis v. Korkos (2010)
Id. at 212, 213-14 .
In Halverson , the court of appeals held that Wis. Stat. §§ 893.55 (1) and 893.56 were constitutional "as applied to Halverson." Halverson, 156 Wis. 2d at 206 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
green
Rouse v. Theda Clark Medical Center, Inc. (2007)
Fund, 2000 WI 98 , 237 Wis. 2d 99 , 613 N.W.2d 849 ; See also Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202 , 456 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App. 1990).
See Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 208 , 456 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App. 1990). ¶ 7.
green
Craig LaFayette Stingley v. Dr. John Laczkowski, OD (2021)
See Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 213-14 , 456 N.W.2d 852 (Ct. App. 1990) (holding that a hospital was properly dismissed from a medical malpractice lawsuit when there was no reasonable showing that the hospital itself concealed any negligent act or omission of the doctor who negligently treated the plaintiff).
holding that a hospital was properly dismissed from a medical malpractice lawsuit when there was no reasonable showing that the hospital itself concealed any negligent act or omission of the doctor who negligently treated the plaintiff
green
In Re Paternity of James AO (1994)
Accord Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 216-217 , 456 N.W.2d 852, 858 (Ct. App. 1990) (citing Hartland-Richmond, in which the court of appeals upheld limitations periods for medical malpractice action under §§ 893.55 and 893.56, STATS., from attack under Article I, sec. 9, stating "limitations period does not violate Wis. Const. art I, sec. 9, solely because it runs before the discovery of the injury."). [9] These decisions are consistent with long-established authorit…
green
James A. O. v. George C. B. (1994)
Accord Halverson v. Tydrich, 156 Wis. 2d 202, 216-217 , 456 N.W.2d 852, 858 (Ct. App. 1990) (citing Hartland-Richmond, in which the court of appeals upheld limitations periods for medical malpractice action under §§ 893.55 and 893.56, Stats., from attack under Article I, sec. 9, stating "limitations period does not violate Wis. Const, art I, sec. 9, solely because it runs before the discovery of the injury.").