Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Green (1997)
green
· 31 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199820122026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1141-42 (D.
because § 4.21 does not “render the [challenged action] inoperative pending IBLA review,” plaintiff “was not required to proceed with its appeal to the IBLA prior to‘seeking judicial review”
green
Idaho Watersheds Project v. Hahn (2002)
Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1141-42 (D.Or.1997).
green
Idaho Watersheds Project Committee for Idaho's High Desert v. Martha G. Hahn, State Director Bureau of Land M… (2002)
Natural Desert Ass'n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1141-42 (D.Or.1997).
green
Simpson v. Haaland (2025)
Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F. Supp. 1133, 1141-42 (D.
green
Conservation Northwest v. Rey (2009)
Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1149 (D.Or.1997).
green
Humane Soc. of US v. Johanns (2007)
Natural Desert Assoc. v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1147 (D.D.C. 1997) ([Defendants and intervenors] assert that an EIS was not required because livestock grazing in the Donner und Blitzen river area is the status quo, and an EIS is not required for an agency’s continued management activities that have been in existence for many years....
green
Riverhawks v. Zepeda (2002)
Thus, although plaintiffs’ expert declarations raise “the specter of interference” with Rogue WSR values, plaintiffs fail to show that “the extent to which the agency allows motorized use of the river in fact substantially interferes with the river’s outstandingly remarkable values.” Hells Canyon Alliance, 227 F.3d at 1178 (emphasis added); see Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Singleton, 47 F.Supp.2d 1182, 1192 (D.Or.1998) (BLM environmental assessment concluded that ORV…
green
Wilderness Watch v. United States Forest Service (2000)
Under Forest Conservation Council, once the district court finds that the USFS has violated the environmental laws, the injunction that Wilderness Watch seeks “will not automatically issue.” See 66 F.3d at 1496; Oregon Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1143 (1997) (balancing harms to determine whether injunction should issue for NEPA and WSRA violation).
balancing harms to determine whether injunction should issue for NEPA and WSRA violation
green
Sierra Club v. Babbitt (1999)
Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Green, *1260 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1149 (D.Or. 1997) (granting injunctive relief on the basis of both NEPA and WSRA violations).
granting injunctive relief on the basis of both NEPA and WSRA violations
green
National Wildlife Federation v. Cosgriffe (1998)
Nevada Land Action Ass’n v. United States Forest Serv., 8 F.3d 7 .13, 715 (9th Cir.1993) (NEPA); Oregon Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1142 (D.Or.1997) (WSRA).
See id. at 1147 ("The WSRA sets forth affirmative duties on the part of federal agencies....
"The WSRA sets forth affirmative duties on the part of federal agencies.... The River Plan here purports to authorize cattle grazing in accordance with the strictures of the WSRA; that involves distinctly different considerations from prior decisions to allow grazing.”
See Oregon Natural Desert Ass’n v. Green, 953 F.Supp. 1133, 1141-2 (D.Or.1997) (holding exhaustion not required under § 4.21 where grant of stay is discretionary).
green
Headwaters v. United States Forest Service (2001)
The parties to the American Lands and Klamath-Siskiyou complaints “sought recognition not of any interests peculiar to themselves, but rather vindication of the public right to require Forest Service compliance with NEPA [and the NFMA].” Sierra Club, 576 F.Supp. at 966 (applying “concept of virtual representation or simple common sense,” in finding privity between Sierra Club and Middle Santiam Wilderness Committee which, among others, were parties to prior proceeding; and O…