Miller v. Auto-Alliance International, Inc. (1997)

green · 50 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 23 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 23

Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199720112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Kovach v. Zurich American Insurance (2009)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 5 citations in this opinion

Moreover, the cases Zurich relied upon in its denial of benefits -Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 385 F.3d 654 (6th Cir.2004); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1012-13 (W.D.Mich.1997); Walker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 24 F.Supp.2d 775, 780-81 (E.D.Mich.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance International, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 175-77 (E.D.Mich.1997); Cates v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 14 F.Supp.2d 1024, 1027 (E.D.Tenn.1996); a…

green Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (1998)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion

Co. of North America, 959 F.Supp. 1361, 1365 (D.Kan.1997) (benefits paid upon receipt of “due proof’ that employee is disabled); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 175 (E.D.Mich.1997) (benefits paid “when [insurer] receive[s] notice and satisfactory proof of loss”) (citing Miller and Yeager, supra); Bollenbacher v. Helena Chem.

green Thomas Kovach v. Zurich American Insurance Co (2009)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Mich. 1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance International, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172, 175-77 (E.D.

green Stamp v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (2008)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla.1997); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1012 (W.D.Mich.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int'l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.Mich.1997); Cates v. Metro.

green Eckelberry v. ReliaStar Life (2006)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Mich. 1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.

green Michele Eckelberry, in Her Capacity as Beneficiary v. Reliastar Life Insurance Company (2006)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla. *345 1997); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1012 (W.D.Mich.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.Mich.1997); Cates v. Metro.

green Dolores K. Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General Motors, and General Motors Life and Disabili… (2004)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Co., 24 F.Supp.2d 775, 780-81 (E.D.Mich.1997) (same); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 175-77 (E.D.Mich.1997) (same); Cates v. Metro.

green Thomas Baker v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company (1999)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla.1997); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1013 (W.D.Mich.l997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich.1997).

green Baker v. Provident Life (1999)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Mich. 1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int'l, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.

green West v. Aetna Life Insurance (2001)

Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa · 3 citations in this opinion

Thus, the fatal result that occurred in this case should surprise no reasonable person.”) & 1013 (adding, in relation to arguments concerning the applicability of a “self-inflicted injuries” exclusion, “[t]here can be no dispute that the voluntary consumption of alcohol, in conjunction with the high blood content, would seriously impair Hardwick’s judgment and ability to control his vehicle”); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.Mich.1997) (“In …

green DeGreenia v. Life Insurance Company of North America (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Vt.

Int’l, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.

green Fulkerson v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America (2020)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio

Kan. 1997) (benefits paid upon receipt of “due proof” that employee is disabled); Miller v. Auto–Alliance Int'l, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172, 175 (E.D.

benefits paid “when [insurer] receive[s] notice and satisfactory proof of loss”

green Williams v. Life Insurance Co. of North America (2015)

Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich.1997); but see American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Bilyeu, 921 F.2d 87, 89 (6th Cir.1990).

green Danouvong v. Life Insurance Co. of North America (2009)

Rule Authority · D. Conn.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla. 1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.Mich.1997); Fowler v. Metro.

green Arnold Ex Rel. Hill v. Hartford Life Insurance (2008)

Rule Authority · W.D. Va.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla.1997); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co., 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1012 (W.D.Mich.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176-77 (E.D.Mich.1997); Cates v. Metro.

green Lennon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (2006)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

Co., 401 F.Supp.2d 802, 811-12 (E.D.Mich.2005); Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 962 F.Supp. 1010, 1012 (W.D.Mich.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 175-76 (E.D.Mich.1997); Hol-singer v. New England Mut.

green Weatherall v. Reliastar Life Insurance (2005)

Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.

Cozzie , at 1110 (citing Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich.1997) and Fowler v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

green Gaddy v. Hartford Life Ins. Co. (2002)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.

Co., 994 F.Supp. 1419, 1422 (M.D.Fla.1997); Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int'l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich. 1997); but see American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Bilyeu, 921 F.2d 87, 89 (6th Cir.1990).

green Walker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (1997)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

In doing so, the court relied in part on two recent district court cases from this circuit in which the court found that a fatal crash involving a person driving while intoxicated was not considered “accidental.” Id. at 174-75.

green Patricia W. Buce v. National Service Industries (2001)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int'l, Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich.1997) (upholding MetLife's denial of AD&D benefits because definition of "accident" used—that death or injury resulting from driving while intoxicated reasonably should have been expected—was not arbitrary and capricious); Fowler v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

green Lennon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (2007)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int'l Inc., 953 F.Supp. 172 (E.D.Mich.1997); Walker v. Metro.

green Lennon v. Met Life (2007)

Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l Inc., 953 F. Supp. 172 (E.D.

green Cozzie v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (1998)

Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see

See Miller v. Auto-Alliance Int’l, Inc.,- 953 F.Supp. 172, 176 (E.D.Mich.1997) (upholding MetLife’s denial of AD & D benefits because - definition of “accident” used—that death or injury resulting from driving while intoxicated reasonably should have been expected— was not arbitrary and capricious); Fowler v. Metropolitan Life Ins.