How cited: United States v. Adams · Go Syfert

United States v. Adams (1999)

green · 25 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
In those cases, we rejected a strict liability interpretation in contrast to the holdings of other circuits. 3 See United States v. Lee, 217 F.3d 284, 289 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 576 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Sylvester, 848 F.2d 520, 522 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Delahoussaye, 573 F.2d 910, 912 (5th Cir.1978).
green United States v. Lee (2000)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 578 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Sylvester, 848 F.2d 520, 522 (5th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 578 (5th Cir.1999).
green Strangi v. CIR (2005)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See, 8 As we observed in Kimbell, 371 F.3d at 266: The proper focus therefore on whether a transfer to a partnership is for adequate and full consideration is: (1) whether the interest credited to each of the partners was proportionate to the fair market value of the assets each partner contributed to the partnership, (2) whether the assets contributed by each partner to the partnership were properly credited to the respective capital accounts of the partners, and (3) whethe…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
In those cases, we rejected a strict liability interpretation in contrast to the holdings of other circuits. 3 See United States v. Lee, 217 F.3d 284, 289 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 576 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Sylvester, 848 F.2d 520, 522 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Delahoussaye, 573 F.2d 910, 912 (5th Cir.1978).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 578 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Sylvester, 848 F.2d 520, 522 (5th Cir. 1988).
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
No. 771 at 3 n. 1 (citing United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 576 (5th Cir. 1999)).) Prior to its decisions in Stephans and Morgan , the Fifth Circuit stated that it " ‘require[s] a minimum level of scienter as a necessary element of an offense of the MBTA’ ” with respect to baiting offenses.
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
Reg. 29,799 , 29,803 (June 3, 1999); see also United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 1999) (analyzing an earlier version of 50 C.F.R. § 20.21 (i)).
analyzing an earlier version of 50 C.F.R. § 20.21 (i)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 576-77 (5th Cir.1999).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571, 578 (5th Cir. 1999).
Cited (see also) · W.D. La. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Adams, 174 F.3d 571 , 574-75 & n. 2 (5th Cir.1999) (reversing a criminal conviction on non-constitutional grounds, but collecting examples of courts’ uniform agreement on this regulation’s constitutionality).