Eckroade v. Eckroade (1990)

green · 26 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199020082026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Rey v. Rey (2000)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

On remand, the court must amend the judgment to reflect a reservation of jurisdiction to “modify its alimony ruling if in the future the wife demonstrates a need and the husband has the ability to pay alimony.” Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347, 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

green Cervoni v. Cervoni (1998)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The following chart demonstrates the discrepancies between the court's valuations and the values in the testimony: *284 WIFE'S AWARD HUSBAND'S AWARD Court's Wife's Husband's Court's Wife's Husband's Value Testimony Testimony Value Testimony Testimony 401K 11,000 11,394 Bus. 10,000 7,000 3,500 Furn. 3,000 8,000 17,589 Truck 4,000 3,000 3,000 Jewelry Not 2,500 10,000 Valued TOTALS 14,000 21,894 27,589 14,000 10,000 6,500 A trial court's "valuations of property must be consiste…

green Young v. Young (1996)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

See Long v. Long, 622 So.2d 622, 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williamson v. Williamson, 367 So.2d 1016 (Fla.1979).

green Toledo v. Toledo (2000)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

green Baxter v. Baxter (1998)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See also Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

green Poole v. Commissioner (1998)

Cited · Tax Ct. · signal: see

See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So. 2d 1347 , 1349 (Fla. Dist.

green Misdraji v. Misdraji (1997)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

green Brock v. Brock (1997)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). . § 61.075(6); Huber v. Huber, 687 So.2d 42 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). . § 61.075(1), Fla.Stat. . § 61.075(1), Fla.Stat. .

green Aresty v. Weinstein (1996)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347, 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

green Romano v. Romano (1994)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 597 So.2d 835, 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Poe v. Poe, 522 So.2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

green Heilman v. Heilman (1992)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See also Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So.2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (fact that one party was involved in serious relationship with third party is insufficient reason to deny alimony or to divide the marital assets inequitably); Pardue v. Pardue, 518 So.2d 954, 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (improper to refuse alimony merely because of evidence of requesting spouse's adultery).

fact that one party was involved in serious relationship with third party is insufficient reason to deny alimony or to divide the marital assets inequitably