How cited: Choate v. Landis Tool Co. · Go Syfert

Choate v. Landis Tool Co. (1980)

green · 39 citation events across 13 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198120032026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
U.S. v. Certain Parcel of Land in Wayne County, Michigan, 466 F.2d 1295, 1297 (6th Cir.1972) (per curiam); Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774, 775 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Rule Authority · N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
Heist Corp., 743 P.2d 1135, 1139 (5th Cir.1984); Love v. Flour Mills of Am., 647 F.2d 1058 , 1062 (10th Cir.1981); Lane v. Kingsport Armature & Elec., 676 F.Supp. 108, 111 (D.Va.1988); Gaines v. Excel Indus., Inc., 667 F.Supp. 569, 574-77 (M.D.Tenn.1987); Peterson v. Trailways, Inc., 555 F.Supp. 827, 832-33 (D.Colo.1983); Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., 513 F.Supp. 314, 325-26 (C.D.Ca.1980); In re Johns-Manville/Asbestosis Cases, 511 F.Supp. 1229, 1234 (N.D.Ill.1981); M…
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
“When evidence is incomplete or disputed, the matter should not be disposed of summarily, but instead should be left for determination by the trier of fact.” Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774, 775 (E.D.Mich.1980); see also Delzotti v. Facstore, Inc. (In re Facstore, Inc.), 2007 WL 2245824 , at *9 (Bankr.D.N.J.
Rule Authority · Bankr. E.D. Mich.
Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774, 775 (E.D.Mich.1980).
green Searcy v. Paul (1985)
Rule Authority · Mass. App. Ct.
N.Y. 1979, Ga. Law); Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F. Supp. 774, 775-781 (E.D.
green Berger v. Mead (1983)
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
Wells v Firestone Tire & Rubber Co, 97 Mich App 790 ; 296 NW2d 174 (1980); Choate v Landis Tool Co, 486 F Supp 774, 777, fn 3 (ED Mich, 1980).
Cited (see also) · Wyo. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also, Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See, Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774, 775 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1980).
Cited (see also) · Mich. · signal: see also
See also Nichols v Uniroyal, Inc, 399 So 2d 751 (La App, 1981). [11] Choate v Landis Tool Co, 486 F Supp 774 (ED Mich, 1980) (parent corporation does not obtain immunity based on its subsidiary's immunity); Rick v R L C Corp, 535 F Supp 39 (ED Mich, 1981) (court suggests that parent does not obtain subsidiary's immunity, but court held that parent did not owe a duty to this particular employee); Oliver v St Clair Metal Products Co, 45 Mich App 242 ; 206 NW2d 444 (1973) (cour…
parent corporation does not obtain immunity based on its subsidiary's immunity
Cited (see also) · D. Colo. · signal: compare
Compare Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (D.Mich.1980). 19 .
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Choate v. Landis *590 Tool Co., 486 F. Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich. 1980); Latham v. Technar, Inc., 390 F. Supp. 1031 (E.D.Tenn. 1974).
green Rick v. RLC CORP. (1981)
Cited (see also) · E.D. Mich. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Choate v. Landis Tool Co., 486 F.Supp. 774 (E.D.Mich.1980); O’Brien v. Grumman Corp., 475 F.Supp. 284 (S.D.N.Y.1979); Latham v. Techmar, Inc., 390 F.Supp. 1031 (E.D.Tenn.1974).
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Choate v Landis Tool Co, 486 F Supp 774 (ED Mich, 1980).