How cited: Curington v. State · Go Syfert

Curington v. State (1998)

green · 11 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“Where evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.” Smith, 2025 WL 1786726 , at *5 (quoting Curington v. State, 704 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)) “Additionally, in assessing whether there is any evidence to support a theory of self-defense, no particular type of evidence is required.” Smith, 2025 WL 1786726 , at *5.
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“Where evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.” Curington v. State, 704 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 13 Additionally, in assessing whether there is any evidence to support a theory of self-defense, no particular type of evidence is required. “[A] defendant is not required to testify at trial to receive a jury instruction on self-defense.” Spurgeon, 114 So. 3d …
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“Where evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.” Curington v. State, 704 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 13 Additionally, in assessing whether there is any evidence to support a theory of self-defense, no particular type of evidence is required. “[A] defendant is not required to testify at trial to receive a jury instruction on self-defense.” Spurgeon, 114 So. 3d …
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“Where evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.” Curington v. State, 704 So. 2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
green Brown v. State (2013)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Curington v. State, 704 So.2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
green Robbins v. State (2004)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
The circumstances must be such that the defendant had cause to think loss of life or serious injury is imminent." Curington v. State, 704 So.2d 1137, 1139-40 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (citations omitted). [4] Certainly, a defendant's state of mind at the time of the offense is relevant when self-defense is an issue.
citations omitted
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Curington v. State, 704 So.2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Ramsaran v. State, 664 So.2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Rogers v. State, 626 So.2d 339, 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 597 So.2d 377, 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Bunn v. State, 363 So.2d 16, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
green Galiano v. State (2003)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Curington v. State, 704 So.2d 1137, 1139-40 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (stating that “[wjhere evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.”).
stating that “[wjhere evidence presented at trial supports an instruction on self-defense (use of deadly force as well as non-deadly force), it is error not to give it.”
green Deluge v. State (1998)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Curington v. State, 704 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Howard v. State, 698 So.2d 923 .