In Re JS (1999)
green
· 29 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In Re KT (2003)
This and other courts of appeals have held that, although review of a juvenile disposition order is conducted under an abuse of discretion standard, the trial court's findings of fact are reviewed for legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence. *73 See, e.g., In re of K.R., 82 S.W.3d 660, 661 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.); In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); In re A.S., 954 S.W.2d 855, 861 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no pet.).
green
In the Matter of K.T. (2003)
See, e.g., In re of K.R., 82 S.W.3d 660, 661 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.); In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); In re A.S., 954 S.W.2d 855, 861 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no pet.).
green
In the Matter of R.R. v. the State of Texas (2025)
B.R., 2020 WL 3969556 , at *7 (upholding trial court’s order committing juvenile to TJJD despite “some qualitative improvement” in juvenile’s behavior at home pending disposition (citing In re J.M., 433 S.W.3d 792 , 794–96 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014, no pet.))); cf. In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 375 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (finding abuse of discretion when the juvenile “[c]learly . . . did more than exhibit temporary remorsefulness because he was caught”).
green
In re E.K.G. (2016)
In re K.R., 82 S.W.3d 660, 661 (Tex,App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.); In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.).
green
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Sonnie Madere (2003)
In re J.S. , 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Doyle v. Doyle , 955 S.W.2d 478, 479 (Tex. App.-Austin 1997, no pet.).
See In re A.E.E. , 89 S.W.3d 250, 256 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002, no pet.); In re J.D.P. , 85 S.W.3d 420, 426 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.); In re J.S. , 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); In re J.R. , 907 S.W.2d 107, 110 (Tex. App.—Austin 1995, no writ).
green
In Re AEE (2002)
In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Doyle v. Doyle, 955 S.W.2d 478, 479 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997, no pet.).
green
In the Matter of A.E.E., a Juvenile (2002)
In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Doyle v. Doyle, 955 S.W.2d 478, 479 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997, no pet.).
green
In re K.R. (2002)
In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no. pet.).
green
in the Matter of K.R. (2002)
In re J.S. , 993 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1999, no. pet.).
green
In the Matter of N.R.W. v. the State of Texas (2024)
See In re E.K.G., 487 S.W.3d at 675– 76; see also In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (concluding that the juvenile court abused its discretion in committing juvenile to TJJD where “[t]here was no evidence that [juvenile’s] father could not provide the quality of care and level of support and supervision which [juvenile] needed”); In re A.S., 954 S.W.2d 855, 863 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, no pet.) (same where the only evidence consisted of the…
green
In the Matter of N.R.W. v. the State of Texas (2024)
See In re E.K.G., 487 S.W.3d at 675– 76; see also In re J.S., 993 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (concluding that the juvenile court abused its discretion in committing juvenile to TJJD where “[t]here was no evidence that [juvenile’s] father could not provide the quality of care and level of support and supervision which [juvenile] needed”); In re A.S., 954 S.W.2d 855, 863 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, no pet.) (same where the only evidence consisted 6 of t…
green
in the Matter of E.C.D., Jr. (2007)
See In re J.S ., 993 S.W.2d 370 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (remanding for new disposition hearing where evidence did not support findings made under section 54.04(i)); In re K.L.C ., 972 S.W.2d 203, 206-07 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1998, no pet.) (remanding for new disposition hearing where no evidence was introduced that any effort was made to find an alternative to TYC commitment); In re A.S. , 954 S.W.2d 855, 862-63 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1997, no pet.) (remanding for…