Crossley v. State (1992)

green · 104 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 45 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 45

Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199220092026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Gonzales v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 6 citations in this opinion

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Hart v. State (2011)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

See also Ellis v. State, 622 So.2d 991, 999 (Fla.1993) (quoting Wright v. State, 586 So.2d 1024, 1030 (Fla.1991), which, in turn, quoted Garcia); Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449-50 (Fla.1992) (holding that while “[t]he justifications for the consolidation of charges are convenience and the preservation of the courts’ valuable resources ... practicality and efficiency cannot outweigh the defendant’s right to a fair trial,” citing State v. Vazquez, 419 So.2d 1088 (Fla.19…

green Ellis v. State (1993)

Rule Authority · Fla. · 3 citations in this opinion

In Crossley, 596 So.2d at 449-50 (citations omitted), we further stated: The justifications for the consolidation of charges are convenience and the preservation of the courts' valuable resources.

citations omitted

green Justin Ryan McMillian v. State of Florida (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992).

green William J. Plott v. State of Florida (2014)

Quote Authority · Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion

Crossley v. State, 596 So. 2d 447, 449 (Fla. 1992) (“Because the court below in the instant case reached the opposite result on controlling facts which [were substantially] identical, . . . we concluded that a conflict of decisions existed that warranted accepting jurisdiction.”).

“Because the court below in the instant case reached the opposite result on controlling facts which [were substantially] identical, . . . we concluded that a conflict of decisions existed that warranted accepting jurisdiction.”

green Wallace v. Dean (2009)

Rule Authority · Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion

Bd. of Escambia County, 395 So.2d 584, 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (having undertaken the operation of school-crossing lights, the school board had a duty to do so in a reasonable manner). [3] See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla.1992); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 94 (Fla. 1983). [4] To wit: (1) the announcement of a rule of law that conflicts with a rule previously announced by this Court or another district court; or (2) the application of a rule of law to produce …

green Hempstead v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

The danger in improper consolidation lies in the fact that evidence relating to each of the crimes may have the effect of bolstering the proof of the other." Id. at 450 (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green Michael Boatwright v. State of Florida (2025)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Gonzales v. State, 9 So. 3d 725, 726 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Crossley v. State, 596 So. 2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992)).

green Clarck Paul v. State of Florida (2025)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“The danger in improper consolidation lies in the fact that evidence relating to each of the crimes may have the effect of bolstering the proof of the other.” Crossley v. State, 596 So. 2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992).

green Maqueira v. State (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

McMillian v. State, 214 So.3d 1274, 1287 (Fla. 2017), and Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992) (orders regarding consolidation and severance under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.150 and 3.152 are reviewed for an abuse of discretion); Spencer v. State, 645 So.2d 377, 381-82 (Fla. 1994) (crimes separated by a substantial lapse of time can be causally related when “they all stem from the same underlying- dispute and involve the same parties”); Brunner v. Sta…

orders regarding consolidation and severance under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.150 and 3.152 are reviewed for an abuse of discretion

green KERVEN CHARLES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla. 1992).

green Lindsey v. State (2017)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992) (“We recognize that sometimes it is difficult to decide whether two separate crimes are related.

“We recognize that sometimes it is difficult to decide whether two separate crimes are related. For this reason, we have held that the standard of review for cases involving the consolidation or severance of charges is one of abuse of discretion.”

green Dodge v. State (2016)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Victor Castillo v. State of Florida (2015)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Timothy W. Fletcher v. State of Florida (2015)

Rule Authority · Fla.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Allen v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“Courts have recognized that the danger of improper consolidation lies in the fact that evidence relating to each of the crimes may have the effect of bolstering the proof of the other.” Dupree v. State, 705 So.2d 90, 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992)).

green Williams v. State (2010)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Estrich v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The court reasoned: "[T]he fact that the defendant's statement that he was smoking marijuana the night before, that there is an accident the next morning, that they do find marijuana in his possession, you don't think that that's somewhat linked together?" The trial court failed to adequately consider the ground for severance in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.152(a)(2)(A), that a severance is "appropriate to promote a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or inno…

green Byrd v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The supreme court explained in Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449-50 (Fla.1992): The justifications for the consolidation of charges are convenience and the preservation of the courts' valuable resources.

green Swagerty v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

As this Court concluded unanimously in Doctor, placing such a broad interpretation on section 316.610 would produce results "clearly beyond the statute's intended purpose of ensuring the safe condition of vehicles operating on our state's streets and highways." 596 So.2d at 447.

green Sule v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992).

green McNabb v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Shermer v. State (2006)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

In Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449-50 (Fla.1992), the supreme court explained the competing interests at stake when the court evaluates a motion to sever charges: The justifications for the consolidation of charges are convenience and the preservation of the courts' valuable resources.

green Stephens v. State (2003)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

In Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 448 (Fla.1992), the defendant committed his first offenses when he briefly kidnapped Betty White, robbed her, and then released her, stealing her car.

green Cousin v. State (2003)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449-450 (Fla.1992).

green Johnson v. State (2001)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992); Shape v. State, 517 So.2d 780, 781 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

green State v. Conde (1999)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

P 3.150; Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla.1992) (citing the appellate court’s opinion in Crossley v. State, 580 So.2d 801, 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)).

green Dupree v. State (1998)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Rohan v. State (1997)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The court observed that [t]he attempted rape and accompanying violence of [Gudinas'] aborted entry into [the first woman's] car, and the actual rape and extreme violence of his murder of [the second woman] demonstrate a "meaningful relationship" between the two attacks as required by Crossley [v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992) ].

green Gudinas v. State (1997)

Rule Authority · Fla.

We further addressed the rules of permissible joinder in Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992), wherein we explained that "[t]he danger in improper consolidation lies in the fact that evidence relating to each of the crimes may have the effect of bolstering the proof of the other." To forestall that possibility, we required trial courts to find "a meaningful relationship between the charges of two separate crimes before permitting them to be tried together." Id. (…

green Griner v. State (1995)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

We would also note that in the present case, the trial court severed the two incidents, which were charged in the same information, for purposes of trial, which appears to be consistent with Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla. 1992).

green Tartarini v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Crossley, 596 So.2d at 450 .

green Rodriguez v. State (2005)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See *550 Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992); Stephens v. State, 863 So.2d 434, 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Bateson v. State, 761 So.2d 1165, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

green Bateson v. State (2000)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992); Wonyetye v. State, 648 So.2d 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

green Darling v. State (2012)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Ferrante v. State (2008)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992) (standard of review for the consolidation or severance of charges is abuse of discretion); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980) (discretion is abused when no reasonable judge would *1285 take the view adopted by the trial judge); Ellis v. State, 622 So.2d 991, 1000 (Fla. 1993) (offenses are properly joined if connected in some significant way, including fact that one crime is causally related to another …

green Burnett v. State (2008)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Aravena v. Miami-Dade County (2006)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla.1992) (concluding that because the court below "reached the opposite result on controlling facts which, if not virtually identical, more *1167 strongly dictated" the result reached by the alleged conflict case, a conflict of decisions existed that warranted accepting jurisdiction).

green Smith v. State (2005)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992).

green Lugo v. State (2003)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992).

green Mese v. State (2002)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Fotopoulos v. State, 608 So.2d 784, 790 (Fla.1992)' Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992); Wright v. State, 739 So.2d 1230, 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

green Smithers v. State (2002)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992).

green Geldreich v. State (1999)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green State v. Fudge (1994)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 450 (Fla.1992).

green Granville v. State (1993)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992).