How cited: Raymond v. Rahme · Go Syfert

Raymond v. Rahme (2002)

green · 127 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 6 citations in this opinion
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat’l Bank v. Sledge, 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex.1983)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985). .....................6 Raymond v. Rahme, 78 SW3d 552, 563 (Tex. App—Austin, 2002, no pet.) ..........19 Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 625, 628 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989), aff’d, 813 S.W.2d 483 (Tex.1991); ...........................................9, 10 Southland Life Ins.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green in Re Richard Scheller (2009)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. , 517 S.W.2d 270, 273 (Tex. 1974); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 517 S.W.2d 270, 273 (Tex. 1974); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · E.D. Tex.
“Mere knowledge that the property owner will benefit from the contract is insufficient to establish a third-party beneficiary arrangement.” Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing Espey Huston, 899 S.W.2d at 420 ); see RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 302, illus. 19.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Oct. 26, 2015); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App. 2002); Waters v. Electrolux Home Prod., Inc., 154 F. Supp.3d 340, 350 (N.D.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Rivera, 208 S.W.3d at 22 ; Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Given that there was no evidence that the Youngs or even Starn knew that Starn would perform services on the house at the time the contract was made, that connection is not, by itself, the kind of connection that will support a DTPA claim. 79 See, e.g., Todd, 156 S.W.3d at 922 (reciting the types of connections to a transaction on which DTPA liability may be based). 80 Cf. Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (holding that the evidence did no…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Grp., LLC, 420 S.W.3d 45 , 50–51 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (“A review of the opinions of the intermediate courts of appeal in Texas regarding the question of implied warranties between the owner of a property and a subcontractor reveals that our sister courts have consistently held that a property owner may not recover from a subcontractor with whom the owner had no direct relationship.”); Pugh, 243 S.W.3d at 89 (property owner may not recover under implied warranty…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Grp., LLC, 420 S.W.3d 45 , 50–51 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (“A review of the opinions of the intermediate courts of appeal in Texas regarding the question of implied warranties between the owner of a property and a subcontractor reveals that our sister courts have consistently held that a property owner may not recover from a subcontractor with whom the owner had no direct relationship.”); Pugh, 243 S.W.3d at 89 (property owner may not recover under implied warranty…
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · signal: cf.
However, this same case also holds: “[h]owever, ‘substantial compliance’ is not a license to ignore statutory requirements.” Id. at 559 ; cf. Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 560 (Tex. App.—Austin, 2002, no pet.) (stating that if the subcontractor does not give the owner timely notice containing the statutory warning, the lien is invalid).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 53.082 (West 2007); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex.App.Austin 2002, no pet.) (discussing trapped and retained funds).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 8 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.). 13 The family code defines “family violence” to include “an act by a member of a family or household against another member of the family or household that is intended to result in physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or sexual assault or that is a threat that reasonably places the member in fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or sexual assault, but does not inclu…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.), Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.), and Codner v. Arellano , 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green John Williams v. State (2010)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. 1986); Navasota Res., Ltd. v. Heep Petroleum, Inc. , 212 S.W.3d 463, 468 (Tex. App.--Austin 2006, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. 1986); Navasota Res., Ltd. v. Heep Petroleum, Inc., 212 S.W.3d 463, 468 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat’l Bank v. Sledge, 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. 1983)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat'l Bank v. Sledge , 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. 1983)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc., 964 S.W.2d 276, 285-86 (Tex. 1998); Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc. , 964 S.W.2d 276, 285-86 (Tex. 1998); Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.); Codner v. Arellano , 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.). 5: See Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc. , 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). 6: Appellants are homeowners just like the appellant in Glenn .
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.); Codner v. Arellano, 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.). 5 … See Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). 5 properly design the foundation upon which the future homeowner’s home would rest.” No. 02-07-00172-CV, 2008 WL 2078510 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Wort…
green in Re Hope Rampy (2009)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green C.B. v. D.S. (2009)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding that homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation work on home and stating that homeowner’s remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (noting that, because property owner has recourse aga…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Co. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding that homeowner did 3 … Glenn states, “As a result of the damage element being wiped clean from [her] two causes of action, [Appellees] prevailed on summary judgment.” 4 … Because Texas courts have consistently ruled on this issue and have adequately set forth the public policy considerations involved, we decline Glenn’s request to set forth yet another in-depth public policy analysis.…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Krupar Const. Co., Inc. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation work on home and stating that homeowner's remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc. , 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (holding plaintif…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Krupar Const. Co., Inc. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation *90 work on home and stating that homeowner’s remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (holding plaintiffs…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).