Raymond v. Rahme (2002)
green
· 127 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat’l Bank v. Sledge, 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex.1983)).
green
Steven C. Albright and Rhonda Albright v. Rhea & Sons Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Rhea Plumbing (2015)
Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985). .....................6 Raymond v. Rahme, 78 SW3d 552, 563 (Tex. App—Austin, 2002, no pet.) ..........19 Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 625, 628 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989), aff’d, 813 S.W.2d 483 (Tex.1991); ...........................................9, 10 Southland Life Ins.
green
Black + Vernooy Architects v. Smith (2011)
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
SAFESHRED, INC. v. Martinez (2010)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Successor by Merger to Bank One, N.A. and Michael Bobinchuck v. Texas Contract Ca… (2009)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
in Re Richard Scheller (2009)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Co. , 517 S.W.2d 270, 273 (Tex. 1974); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Co., 517 S.W.2d 270, 273 (Tex. 1974); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
“Mere knowledge that the property owner will benefit from the contract is insufficient to establish a third-party beneficiary arrangement.” Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing Espey Huston, 899 S.W.2d at 420 ); see RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 302, illus. 19.
green
Weidman v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
Oct. 26, 2015); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App. 2002); Waters v. Electrolux Home Prod., Inc., 154 F. Supp.3d 340, 350 (N.D.
Rivera, 208 S.W.3d at 22 ; Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Wanda Young, Tommie Young, Courtney Young, Ashley Young, and Justin Young v. Pulte Homes of Texas, L.P., Hori… (2016)
Given that there was no evidence that the Youngs or even Starn knew that Starn would perform services on the house at the time the contract was made, that connection is not, by itself, the kind of connection that will support a DTPA claim. 79 See, e.g., Todd, 156 S.W.3d at 922 (reciting the types of connections to a transaction on which DTPA liability may be based). 80 Cf. Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (holding that the evidence did no…
Grp., LLC, 420 S.W.3d 45 , 50–51 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (“A review of the opinions of the intermediate courts of appeal in Texas regarding the question of implied warranties between the owner of a property and a subcontractor reveals that our sister courts have consistently held that a property owner may not recover from a subcontractor with whom the owner had no direct relationship.”); Pugh, 243 S.W.3d at 89 (property owner may not recover under implied warranty…
Grp., LLC, 420 S.W.3d 45 , 50–51 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (“A review of the opinions of the intermediate courts of appeal in Texas regarding the question of implied warranties between the owner of a property and a subcontractor reveals that our sister courts have consistently held that a property owner may not recover from a subcontractor with whom the owner had no direct relationship.”); Pugh, 243 S.W.3d at 89 (property owner may not recover under implied warranty…
green
Ajas, Inc. v. Idaho Pacific Lumber Company, Inc. (2015)
However, this same case also holds: “[h]owever, ‘substantial compliance’ is not a license to ignore statutory requirements.” Id. at 559 ; cf. Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 560 (Tex. App.—Austin, 2002, no pet.) (stating that if the subcontractor does not give the owner timely notice containing the statutory warning, the lien is invalid).
See Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 53.082 (West 2007); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559-60 (Tex.App.Austin 2002, no pet.) (discussing trapped and retained funds).
green
Edward Nwokedi and 1002 Gemini Interests, LLC v. Unlimited Restoration Specialists, Inc. (2014)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002, no pet.).
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 8 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Stuart Thomas Gerstacker v. Kimberly Ann Gerstacker (2011)
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Black + Vernooy Architects, J. Sinclair Black, and D. Andrew Vernooy v. Lou Ann Smith Jimmy Jackson Smith, In… (2011)
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 561 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.). 13 The family code defines “family violence” to include “an act by a member of a family or household against another member of the family or household that is intended to result in physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or sexual assault or that is a threat that reasonably places the member in fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or sexual assault, but does not inclu…
Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Paul Schambacher AND R.E.I. Electric, Inc. v. R.E.I Electric, Inc. and Garland Insulating, Ltd. AND Paul Scha… (2010)
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.), Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.), and Codner v. Arellano , 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.)).
green
Robert Jamison v. State (2010)
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
John Thomas Izzo v. Sharon Diane Izzo (2010)
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Safeshred, Inc. v. Louis Martinez, III (2010)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
John Williams v. State (2010)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Thomas Williams (2010)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Thomas Williams (2010)
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1986); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Dean Warner-Lapasinskas and Jamie Sanders v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (2009)
See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann , 722 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. 1986); Navasota Res., Ltd. v. Heep Petroleum, Inc. , 212 S.W.3d 463, 468 (Tex. App.--Austin 2006, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Dean Warner-Lapasinskas and Jamie Sanders v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (2009)
See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Tex. 1986); Navasota Res., Ltd. v. Heep Petroleum, Inc., 212 S.W.3d 463, 468 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat’l Bank v. Sledge, 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. 1983)).
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 559 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.) (citing First Nat'l Bank v. Sledge , 653 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Tex. 1983)).
green
Nemona Febonio v. State (2009)
Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc., 964 S.W.2d 276, 285-86 (Tex. 1998); Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs., 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Nemona Febonio v. State (2009)
Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc. , 964 S.W.2d 276, 285-86 (Tex. 1998); Raymond v. Rahme & Williams Invs. , 78 S.W.3d 552, 555-56 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Patrick J. Irwin and Sondra Irwin v. Nortex Foundation Designs, Inc. and Jerry Coffee, P.E. (2009)
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.); Codner v. Arellano , 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.). 5: See Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc. , 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). 6: Appellants are homeowners just like the appellant in Glenn .
green
Patrick J. Irwin and Sondra Irwin v. Nortex Foundation Designs, Inc. and Jerry Coffee, P.E. (2009)
Co. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.); Codner v. Arellano, 40 S.W.3d 666 , 672–74 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.). 5 … See Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). 5 properly design the foundation upon which the future homeowner’s home would rest.” No. 02-07-00172-CV, 2008 WL 2078510 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Wort…
green
in Re Hope Rampy (2009)
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
C.B. v. D.S. (2009)
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
Co. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding that homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation work on home and stating that homeowner’s remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 563 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (noting that, because property owner has recourse aga…
Co. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding that homeowner did 3 … Glenn states, “As a result of the damage element being wiped clean from [her] two causes of action, [Appellees] prevailed on summary judgment.” 4 … Because Texas courts have consistently ruled on this issue and have adequately set forth the public policy considerations involved, we decline Glenn’s request to set forth yet another in-depth public policy analysis.…
Krupar Const. Co., Inc. v. Rosenberg , 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation work on home and stating that homeowner's remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc. , 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (holding plaintif…
green
Pugh v. General Terrazzo Supplies, Inc. (2007)
Krupar Const. Co., Inc. v. Rosenberg, 95 S.W.3d 322, 332 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (holding homeowner did not have cause of action for common law breach of implied warranty against subcontractor who performed foundation *90 work on home and stating that homeowner’s remedy for damages resulting from faulty construction was against general contractor); Rayon v. Energy Specialties, Inc., 121 S.W.3d 7, 21 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (holding plaintiffs…
green
Clarence Davis v. Mary Ellen Davis (2007)
Raymond v. Rahme , 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Clarence Davis v. Mary Ellen Davis (2007)
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).
green
Clarence Davis v. Mary Ellen Davis (2007)
Raymond v. Rahme, 78 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.).