Wolfe v. Wolfe (2007)
green
· 17 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Aquilina v. Aquilina (2014)
Our holding in Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), is instructive.
green
Schang v. Schang (2011)
Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So.2d 632, 636 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see Overton v. Overton, 34 So.3d 759, 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
green
SUSAN LEE MALOWNEY v. JOHN RAPHAEL MALOWNEY (2018)
See § 61.14(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So. 2d 632, 634-36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (reversing order denying modification petition where the trial court failed to consider material allegations and facts asserted by the petitioner as constituting a substantial change in circumstances and recognizing "that all applicable section 61.08(2) factors in determining alimony must be considered in modification proceedings under section 61.14").
reversing order denying modification petition where the trial court failed to consider material allegations and facts asserted by the petitioner as constituting a substantial change in circumstances and recognizing "that all applicable section 61.08(2
green
Regan v. Regan (2017)
See Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Antepenko v. Antepenko, 824 So.2d 214, 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
See Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So.2d 632, 636-37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (finding expenses a former wife spent on an adult son "are not properly included -in her needs evaluation” because "[a] parent has no legal obligation to provide post-majority support for a child and cannot be compelled to support an adult child indirectly through the payment of alimony.”).
green
Coniglio v. Coniglio (2007)
See Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So.2d 632, 636-37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). *581 We recognize the broad discretion given trial judge's in making alimony awards.