Shaw v. Wuttke (1965)
green
· 54 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196519952026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Nobles (1975)
Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis. 2d 448, 454-456 , 137 N. W. 2d 649, 652-653 (1965); State ex rel.
To the same general effect see Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis2d 448, 137 NW2d 649, 653 (1965).
green
State v. Revels (1998)
Even if such a leap could be made, he has not indicated how the information from his expert fits Dudek's definition of work product as "the information [the lawyer] has assembled and the mental impressions, the legal theories and strategies that he [or she] has pursued or adopted as derived from interviews, statements, memoranda, correspondence, briefs, legal and factual research, mental impressions, personal beliefs, and other tangible or intangible means." Id. at 589 , 150…
green
State v. Hereford (1995)
Hereford did not add any names to this list in his reply brief. 9 The State does not dispute that Thurner's reports are attorney work product. 10 The State cites Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis. 2d 448, 456 , 137 N.W.2d 649, 653 (1965), for the proposition that all work product protection is lost at trial.
green
Halford v. Yandell (1977)
Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis.2d 448 , 137 N.W.2d 649, 653 [6, 7] (1965); State v. Steinkraus, 76 N.M. 617 , 417 P.2d 431, 433 [7] (1966); Pacific N.W.
See also Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis.2d 448 , 137 N.W.2d 649, 653 (Wis.1965) (“the immunity of the attorney’s work product in respect to a written statement ceases to exist when the person making the statement is placed on the stand as a witness at the trial.
green
Estate of Burgess v. Peterson (1995)
See Shaw v. Wuttke, 28 Wis. 2d 448, 460 , 137 N.W.2d 649, 654-55 (1965) (legal effect of violation of safety statute not dependant on age); Strait v. Crary, 173 Wis. 2d 377, 382-83 , 496 N.W.2d 634, 636 (Ct. App. 1992) (child's age should not be considered when child engaged in an adults-only or licensed activity). 5 While on the stand, each expert was asked to state whether they thought Ralph Grundman was negligent, to which all the experts replied no.
child's age should not be considered when child engaged in an adults-only or licensed activity
See also Shaw v. Wuttke, 137 N.W.2d 649, 653 (Wis. 1965) (“the immunity of the attorney’s work product in respect to a written statement ceases to exist when the person making the statement is placed on the stand as a witness at the trial.