State v. Olson (1993)
green
· 31 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Gonzales v. Thomas (1996)
See Casamayor, 837 F.2d at 1515 (no presumption of bias where juror honestly failed to disclose he had received police training twenty-three years prior to trial); State v. Olson, 179 Wis.2d 715 , 508 N.W.2d 616, 618 (1993) (no implied bias where juror was childhood victim of sexual abuse thirty years before trial), review denied, 515 N.W.2d 715 (Wis.1994); see also Amirault, 968 F.2d at 1406 (no implied bias where juror had blocked her memory of being raped forty years earl…
no implied bias where juror was childhood victim of sexual abuse thirty years before trial
green
State v. Wyrick (2001)
Hughes v. Raines, 641 F.2d 790, 792-93 (9th Cir.1981) (excluding cross-examination of victim on alleged prior false accusation of rape because it amounted to a general credibility attack on the basis of an unrelated incident and there was no convincing proof that the accusation was false); Ex parte Loyd, 580 So.2d 1374, 1376 (Ala.1991) (holding that defendant could cross-examine victim about admittedly false pri- or charges and threats regarding sexual crimes because they we…
green
State s. Anthony Lynn Wyrick (2000)
Ct. App. 1986) (holding that the Confrontation Clause requires that a defendant be allowed to cross-examine a victim about prior false accusations of rape despite Oregon’s evidentiary rule prohibiting extrinsic evidence or cross-examination of a witness about specific instances of conduct to attack credibility); State v. Boiter, 396 S.E.2d 364, 365 (S.C. 1990) (holding that a defendant may cross-examine the victim about a prior false accusation of sexual abuse if the trial c…
holding that a defendant may cross-examine the victim about a prior false accusation of rape but that the Confrontation Clause does not compel the admission of extrinsic evidence
green
State v. Jackson (1997)
State v. Olson, 179 Wis. 2d 715, 724-25 , 508 N.W.2d 616, 620 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoted source omitted).
quoted source omitted
green
State v. Guenther (2004)
See, e.g., State v. Almurshidy, 732 A.2d 280 , 287 n. 4 (Me.1999); State v. Cox, 298 Md. 173 , 468 A.2d 319, 323-24 (1983); State v. Raines, 118 S.W.3d 205, 211-14 (Mo.Ct.App.2003); State v. Scott, 113 N.M. 525 , 828 P.2d 958, 962-63 (Ct.App.1984); State v. Boggs, 63 Ohio St.3d 418 , 588 N.E.2d 813, 816-17 (1992); State v. Wyrick, 62 S.W.3d 751, 780-82 (Tenn.Crim.App.2001); State v. Leggett, 164 Vt. 599 , 664 A.2d 271, 272 (1995); State v. Olson, 179 Wis.2d 715 , 508 N.W.2d …
green
State v. Mayhall (1995)
State v. Olson, 179 Wis. 2d *65 715, 722, 508 N.W.2d 616, 619 (Ct. App. 1993).
green
State v. Kiernan (1998)
See State v. Olson, 179 Wis. 2d 715, 720 , 508 N.W.2d 616, 618 (Ct. App. 1993) (juror's experience as the victim of a crime does not create an implied bias as a matter of law).
juror's experience as the victim of a crime does not create an implied bias as a matter of law