Jensen v. Rice (2002)

green · 16 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Default Proof Credit Card Systems, Inc. v. Friedland (2008)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Jensen v. Rice, 809 So.2d at 898 (applying Florida law and holding that arbitration clause providing for arbitration in foreign jurisdiction and under laws of another state enforceable in Florida under the FAA); Trojan Horse, Inc. v. Lakeside Games, 526 So.2d at 194 ; Butcher *445 & Singer, Inc. v. Frisch, 433 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (finding that trial court correctly enforced arbitration agreement under FAA where contract involved interstate commerce).

applying Florida law and holding that arbitration clause providing for arbitration in foreign jurisdiction and under laws of another state enforceable in Florida under the FAA

green Koechli v. BIP Intern., Inc. (2004)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Jensen v. Rice, 809 So.2d 895, 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)("Florida courts must enforce arbitration agreements that are valid and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, even where, as here, the arbitration agreement would not be enforceable under Florida law.").

"Florida courts must enforce arbitration agreements that are valid and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, even where, as here, the arbitration agreement would not be enforceable under Florida law."

green SACHSE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. AFFIRMED DRYWALL CORP. (2018)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 , 341, 343-44 (2011); Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. -5- 1, 10-11 (1984); Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. v. Wetherald, 885 So. 2d 900, 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Jensen v. Rice, 809 So. 2d 895, 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

green Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (2011)

Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.

Moreover, “Florida courts must enforce arbitration agreements that are valid and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, even where ... the arbitration agreement would not be enforceable under Florida law.” Jensen v. Rice, 809 So.2d 895, 899 (Fla.App.2002) (citations omitted). 26 .

green Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. (2005)

Cited (see also) · Fla. · signal: see also

See Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 824 So.2d 228, 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Jensen v. Rice, 809 So.2d 895, 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (recognizing that the FAA "supersedes inconsistent state law" and "[a]s a result, Florida courts must enforce arbitration agreements that are valid and enforceable under the [FAA], even where, as here, the arbitration agreement would not be enforceable under Florida law").

recognizing that the FAA "supersedes inconsistent state law" and "[a]s a result, Florida courts must enforce arbitration agreements that are valid and enforceable under the [FAA], even where, as here, the arbitration agreement would not be enforceable under Florida law"

green Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer v. Macro Capital Corp. (2002)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Jensen v. Rice, 809 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), and cases cited; Hirschfeld v. Crescent Heights, X., Inc., 707 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Concrete Design Structures, Inc. v. P.L.