How cited: Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond · Go Syfert

Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (1982)

green · 48 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 173 (D.Md.1982) (" 'The authority to act with the sanction of government behind it determines whether or not a governmental agency exists.' ") (quoting Lassiter v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 176 F.2d 984, 991 (9th Cir.1949)). 59 Staff capabilities may, of course, be relevant indicia of an entity's ability to take substantial independent action, see Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Bd., 482 F.2d 710, 715 (D.C.Cir.1973), …
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Reserve Bank, 558 F. Supp. 165, 173 (D.
quoting 1 K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 5 1.01, at 1 & n.1 (1958)
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 173 (D.Md.1982) (quoting 1 K.
stating the APA’s “statutory definition of ‘agency’ is not entirely clear”
Rule Authority · D. Maryland · 2 citations in this opinion
Nat’l Bank, 111 F.Supp.2d 799 (W.D.La.2000); Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170 (D.Md.1982).
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
While “It]he law on the stmple question of what is an agency is quite complex[,]” McKinney v. Caldera, 141 P. Supp. 2d 25, 31 (D.D.C. 2001) (quoting Lee Constr Co., Ine. □□ Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F. Supp. 165, 172 (D.
green Groce v. Rodriguez (2024)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Reserve Bank, 558 F. Supp. 165, 172 (D.
quoting 1 K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 1:2, at 3 (2d ed. 1978)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 172 (D.
Rule Authority · D. Wyo.
Bank of Richmond, 558 F. Supp. 165, 179 (D.
green Ryan v. United States (2007)
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 172-73 (D.Md.1982).
green McKinney v. Caldera (2001)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 172 (D.Md.1982) (citing 1 K.
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
However, plaintiffs contend that Farm Credit System institutions are “agencies” for APA purposes because they are analogous to Federal Reserve Banks, another heavily regulated institution that has been found to be an agency under the APA See, e.g., Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 179 (D.Md.1982).
Rule Authority · D.R.I.
Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170 (D.Md.1982); Landmark Tower Assocs. v. First Nat’l Bank, 439 F.Supp. 195, 196 (S.D.Fla.1977).
green In Re Vance (1990)
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Okla
It is an abstract proposition that does not neatly decide concrete cases, Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 173 (D.Md.1982) quoting Freedman, Administrative Procedure and the Control of Foreign Direct Investment, 119 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1, 9-10 (1970).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
(Feb. 3, 1984) (bank an executive agency subject to federal procurement laws); Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Resene Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 172-179 (D.Md.1982) (bank a federal agency within the Administrative Procedure Act); Committee to Save the Fox Building v. Birmingham Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 497 F.Supp. 504, 509-510 (N.D.Ala.1980) (regional banks are operating agencies of federal government under direction of Federal Reserve Board; ba…
green Fried v. United States (1983)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
See State of North Dakota v. Merchants National Bank and Trust Co., 634 F.2d at 370-374; Ortiz v. United States, 595 F.2d at 65, 71 ; Transok Pipeline Co. v. Darks, 565 F.2d 1150, 1154-55 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 435 U.S. 1006 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1977); Johnston v. United States, 546 F.Supp. 879, 881-82 (D.Kan. 1982); Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170-72 (D.Md.1982); Eklund v. Hardiman, 526 F.Supp. 941, 943 (N.D.Ill.1981)…
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See generally Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170-71 (D.Md.1982). 14 At the very least, the prudential part of the test is not satisfied in this case.
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See generally Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170-71 (D.Md.1982).
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see
See generally Lee Construction Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 558 F.Supp. 165, 170-171 (D.Md.1982).
green Morley v. Cohen (1985)
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: see
See Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165 (D.Md.1982).
Cited · D. Mass. · signal: see
See generally Lee Construction Co., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 558 F.Supp. 165, 172-76 (D.Md.1982).