How cited: Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health & Human Services · Go Syfert

Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health & Human Services (1983)

green · 33 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 19 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services, 558 F.Supp. 337, 352, 353 (D.Colo.1983); Seniors United for Action v. Ray, 529 F.Supp. 55 , 60 n. 2 (N.D.Iowa 1981).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Illinois v. Schweiker, 707 F.2d at 275-277; Alameda v. Weinberger, 520 F.2d 344, 347-48 (9th Cir.1975); Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services, 558 F.Supp. 337, 347-48 (D.Colo.1983); Connecticut v. Schweiker, 557 F.Supp. at 1079 .
green Minnesota v. Heckler (1983)
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Illinois v. Schweiker, 707 F.2d at 275-277; Alameda v. Weinberger, 520 F.2d 344, 347-48 (9th Cir.1975); Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services, 558 F.Supp. 337, 347-48 (D.Colo.1983); Connecticut v. Schweiker, 557 F.Supp. at 1079 .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Other courts allowing district court jurisdiction over a claim disallowance include Michigan Department of Social Services v. Schweiker, 563 F.Supp. 797 (W.D.Mich.1983); Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services, 558 F.Supp. 337, 348 (D.Colo.1983); and Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance v. Schweiker, 557 F.Supp. 1077, 1079 (D.Conn.1983). 6 .
Rule Authority · D.N.M. · 2 citations in this opinion
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo. 1983).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Servs. v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · Mass.
HCFA’s denial of the Missouri State plan proposed amendment and the letter to the Attorney General of the Commonwealth at best “are simply interpretive rules.” Id., quoting Colorado Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 558 F. Supp. 337, 352 (D.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Indiana Dep’t of Public Welfare v. Bowen, 686 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.Ind.1987); Colorado Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 354 (D.Colo.1983) (amounts of federal matching funds reduced due to the failure of states to meet the statutory requirements of their Utilization Review programs).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Ind. 1987); Colorado Dep't of Social Servs. v. Department of Health and Human Servs. , 558 F. Supp. 337, 354 (D.
amounts of federal matching funds reduced due to the failure of states to meet the statutory requirements of their Utilization Review programs
green Johnson v. Sullivan (1991)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
District courts generally review disputes involving disallowances such as “the failure to perform the inspections necessary under the utilization control requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 1396b(g).” Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health and Human Services, 558 F.Supp. 337, 347 (D.Col.1983); Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879, 885 , 108 S.Ct. 2722, 2727 , 101 L.Ed.2d 749 (1988); see, Georgia v. Califano, 446 F.Supp. 404 (N.D.Ga.1977).
Rule Authority · prsupreme
Serv. v. Dept. of Health, 558 F. Supp. 337, 351 (Colo. D.C. 1983).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Colorado Dep’t of Social Services v. Dep’t of Health and Human Serv., 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983).
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
In Colorado Department of Social Services v. Department of Health, 558 F.Supp. 337, 339 (D.Colo.1983) the defendant conceded and the court agreed, without discussion, that the district court had jurisdiction to review disallowances.
Rule Authority · Mass.
At best HCFA action transmittals “are simply interpretive rules.” Colorado Dep’t of Social Servs. v. Department of Health & *474 Human Servs., 558 F. Supp. 337, 352 (D.
Cited (see also) · Colo. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
We have required either substantial compliance or strict compliance with statutes in order to fulfill our "duty to ascertain the legislative intent and give effect to such intent wherever possible." Id.; see also Colorado Dep't. of Social Servs. v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 558 F.Supp. 337, 351 (D.Colo.1983) (recognizing the "maxim that statutes granting exceptions from clearly articulated public policy obligations should be construed narrowly").