Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co. (1985)
green
· 19 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 15 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
ReportHost LLC v. Spectora Inc. (2025)
Colo. Mar. 10, 2010) (citing Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F. Supp. 790, 793 (D.
holding that “allegations of deceptive trade practices under the [CCPA] are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirement of particularity”
green
Wertz v. Clorox Services Company (2025)
Motion at 5 (citing Duran v. Clover Clubs Food Co., 616 F. Supp. 790, 793 (D.
green
Hauschild GMBH & Co. KG v. Flacktek, Inc. (2022)
Colo. Mar. 10, 2010) (citing Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F. Supp. 790, 793 (D.
holding that “allegations of deceptive trade practices under the [CCPA] are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirement of particularity”
green
RV Horizons, Inc. v. Smith (2019)
Colo. Mar. 1, 2013); Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F. Supp. 790, 793 (D.
green
In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (2012)
Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985); Gen.
green
HealthONE of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc. (2011)
Mar. 4, 2010); Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co. 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985).
green
Ecrix Corp. v. Exabyte Corp. (2000)
Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985) (Kane, J.).
green
Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (1995)
See NCC Sunday Inserts, Inc. v. World Color Press, Inc., 692 F.Supp. 327, 330 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (Connecticut consumer protection statute); Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985) (Colorado consumer protection statute). 9 .
green
May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. Woodard (1993)
In order to effectuate the broad remedial relief and deterrence purposes, the CCPA does not require proof of actual injury. 10 See Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985) (claiming Colorado courts interpret the CCPA as intended to protect consumers against fraud); Western Food Plan, Inc., 198 Colo, at 256, 598 P.2d at 1041 (stating “the broad legislative purpose [is] to provide prompt, economical, and readily available remedies against consumer fra…
green
Kamin v. Colorado Nat. Bank of Denver (1986)
Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985); In re Longhorn Securities Litigation, 573 F.Supp. 255, 263 (W.D.Okla.1983).
Ervin v. Amoco Oil Co., 885 P.2d 246, 254 (Colo.Ct.App.1994) (emphasis added), rev’d on other grounds, 908 P.2d 493, 502 (Colo.1995); see also Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 794 (D.Colo.1985) (rejecting the contention that the plaintiffs were required to allege that the defendant interfered with an “ongoing, specific relationship”); cf. Nat.
See Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985).
See Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 798 (D.Colo.1985) (CCPA claims are subject to Rule 9(b)'s particularity requirement; plaintiffs satisfied rule's requirement because it only requires that claim identify cireum-stances constituting fraud and plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to apprise defendants of alleged deceptive trade practices' nature); see also Heller v. Lexton-Ancira Real Estate Fund, Ltd., 1972, 809 P.2d 1016, 1022 (Colo.App.1990) (even under Ru…
green
Witherspoon v. Philip Morris Inc. (1997)
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 884 F.Supp. 1515 , 1524 & n. 8 (D.Kan.1995) (holding plaintiffs fraud claim failed Rule 9(b) particularity requirement, which in turn meant deceptive trade practices claim failed the particularity requirement) (citation omitted); see also Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.Colo.1985).
green
Davis v. Frapolly (1990)
See Duran v. Clover Club Foods Co., 616 F.Supp. 790, 793 (D.C.Colo.1985).