Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1986)

green · 12 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green In Re the Rate Appeal of Benedictine Health Center (2007)

Rule Authority · Minn. · 2 citations in this opinion

We have stated that "[a]n agency interpretation that `make[s] specific the law enforced or administered by the agency' is an interpretive rule that is valid only if promulgated in accordance with the Act." In re Mapleton Cmty. Home, 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986) (quoting Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. State, 279 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Minn.1979)).

green In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees (2012)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 437 N.W.2d 35, 43-44 (Minn.1989); In re Contested Case of Mapleton Cmty. Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801-02 (Minn.1986).

green E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 (1999)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

An "agency interpretation that 'make[s] specific the law enforced or administered by the agency' is an interpretive rule that is valid only if promulgated in accordance with the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act." Application of Q Petroleum, 498 N.W.2d 772, 780 (Minn.App.1993) (quoting Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986)). 2 .

green Elim Homes, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1998)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986).

green Board of County Commissioners v. Risk Management Division (1995)

Quote Authority · N.M. · signal: cf.

Cf. Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn. 1986) (“If an agency’s interpretation corresponds with the plain meaning of the rule it construes, the agency is not deemed to have promulgated a new rule.”); Sentara-Hampton Gen.

“If an agency’s interpretation corresponds with the plain meaning of the rule it construes, the agency is not deemed to have promulgated a new rule.”

green Application of Q Petroleum (1993)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986) (quoting Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardward Ass’n v. State, 279 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Minn.1979)).

green Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1993)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: cf.

Cf. Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986) (department properly interpreted “rate limitations in effect” language regarding adjustments to property-related costs reported by nursing homes).

green Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1988)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

“An agency interpretation that ‘make[s] specific the law enforced or administered by the agency’ is an interpretive rule that is valid only if promulgated in accordance with the [Minnesota Administrative Procedure] Act.” Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986) (quoting Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Association v. State, 279 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Minn.1979)); see also Minn.Stat. § 14.05, subd. 1 (1984).

green Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1988)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Mapleton Community Home v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Services, 391 N.W.2d 798, 801-02 (Minn.1986).

green Care Providers of Minnesota, Inc. v. Gomez (1996)

Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Dep’t of Human Servs., 391 N.W.2d 798, 801 (Minn.1986) (ratio adopted by DHS to aid in calculating reimbursement rate by translating existing rule from words to numbers not unpromulgated rule).