How cited: Owen v. I.C. System, Inc. · Go Syfert

Owen v. I.C. System, Inc. (2011)

green · 267 citation events across 28 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201120182026
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 3 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
To comply with that requirement, Gulf Coast had to “actually employ[] or implement[] . . . procedures to avoid errors,” and then ensure those procedures were “reasonably adapted to avoid the specific error at issue.” Id. at 1274 (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011). 1 The FMLA grants an eligible employee the right to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave annually for several reasons, including “a serious health condition” that prevents the employee from performing the functions of his position. 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (a)(1).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Quote Authority · 9th Cir.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011) (“This bona fide error defense in § 1692k(c) is an affirmative defense, for which the debt collector has the burden of proof.”); H.
“This bona fide error defense in § 1692k(c) is an affirmative defense, for which the debt collector has the burden of proof.”
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala. · 5 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala. · 4 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR Partners, 601 F.3d 1185, 1190 (11th Cir. 2010)).
citing LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR Partners, 601 F.3d 1185, 1190 (11th Cir. 2010)
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla. · 3 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla. · 3 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Quote Authority · S.D. Fla. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Owen, 629 F.3d at 1275 (“Employing a one-time form contract . . . and blindly relying on creditors to send only valid debts is a procedure, but it is not one reasonably adapted to avoid the type of erroneous . . . charges at issue here.”).
“Employing a one-time form contract . . . and blindly relying on creditors to send only valid debts is a procedure, but it is not one reasonably adapted to avoid the type of erroneous . . . charges at issue here.”
green Gonzalez v. Cullimore (2018)
Quote Authority · Utah · 3 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he FDCPA affords a narrow carve-out to the general rule of strict liability, known as the ‘bona fide error’ defense.”). 15 GONZALEZ v. CULLIMORE Opinion of the Court in the FDCPA as a strong indication that Congress intended § 1692e to be a strict liability provision.45 ¶ 27 The court’s reasoning in Midland Funding suggests, however, that liability under § 1692e cannot be sustained unless there is evidence that the debt c…
“[T]he FDCPA affords a narrow carve-out to the general rule of strict liability, known as the ‘bona fide error’ defense.”
Rule Authority · M.D. Ala. · 2 citations in this opinion
System, Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011) (quoting Edward v. Niagara Credit Sols., Inc., 584 F.3d 1350 , 1352–53 (11th Cir. 2009)) (quotation marks omitted). 5 The Court pretermits discussion of the damages issue. 1.
quoting Edward v. Niagara Credit Sols., Inc., 584 F.3d 1350 , 1352–53 (11th Cir. 2009)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Quote Authority · M.D. Tenn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Mich. 2019) (holding that “whether [a debt collector] maintained procedures reasonably adapted to avoid the error . . . is an objective and fact-intensive inquiry that is generally left to the fact-finder”); Owen, 629 F.3d at 1277 (“reiterat[ing] that the third element of the bona fide error defense is a uniquely fact-bound inquiry susceptible of few broad, generally applicable rules of law”).
“reiterat[ing] that the third element of the bona fide error defense is a uniquely fact-bound inquiry susceptible of few broad, generally applicable rules of law”
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011).
green Gonzalez v. Cullimore (2018)
Quote Authority · Utah · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc. , 629 F.3d 1263 , 1271 (11th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he FDCPA affords a narrow carve-out to the general rule of strict liability, known as the 'bona fide error' defense."). 45 Clark , 460 F.3d at 1176 . 46 Glover v. FDIC , 698 F.3d 139 , 149 (3d Cir. 2012). 47 Id. ; see also Clark , 460 F.3d at 1176 ("Requiring a violation of § 1692e to be knowing or intentional needlessly renders superfluous § 1692k(c)."). 48 Kaplan v. Assetcare, Inc. , 88 F.Supp.2d 1355 , 1362 (S.D.
"[T]he FDCPA affords a narrow carve-out to the general rule of strict liability, known as the 'bona fide error' defense."
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1274 (11th Cir. 2011)).
Quote Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011) (“The FDCPA typically subjects debt collectors to liability even when violations are not knowing or intentional.”).
“The FDCPA typically subjects debt collectors to liability even when violations are not knowing or intentional.”
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
System, Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1276 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1273, 1277 (11th Cir. 3 To be a “bona fide error” requires that the debt collector’s mistake be “objectively reasonable” and that it was “made in good faith; a genuine mistake, as opposed to a contrived mistake.” Edwards, 584 F.3d at 1353 (citing Black’s Law Dictionary 186 (8th ed. 2004) (defining “bona fide” as “1.
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
System, Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing LeBlanc, 601 F.3d at 1190 ).
citing LeBlanc, 601 F.3d at 1190
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
green Jeter v. Carr (2022)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · W.D. Tex.
System, Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 130 S. Ct. 1605, 1611, 1615 (2010)).
citing Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 130 S. Ct. 1605, 1611, 1615 (2010)
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1271 (11th Cir. 2011), but Article III does not.
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1276-77 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1275 (11th Cir. 2011) stands for the proposition that a debt collector cannot merely rely on information provided by a creditor, but most perform its own investigation.
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1272 (lith Cir. 2011) (quoting Jerman, at 586).
quoting Jerman, at 586
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ala.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011); Hawthorne v. Mac Adjustment, Inc., 140 F.3d 1367, 1370 (11th Cir. 1998).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1274 (11th Cir. 2011); see also, e.g., Allen v. Scott, 2011 WL 13079866 , at *5 (N.D.
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir. 2011).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.
Sys., 18 Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1276 (11th Cir. 2011), for example, reversed a summary judgment; it did 19 not address the pleading specificity required to put the defense in play.
Quote Authority · E.D. Tex.
Sys., Inc., 629 F.3d 1263, 1270-71 (11th Cir. 2011) (“The FDCPA typically subjects debt collectors to liability even when violations are not knowing or intentional.”); Kistner v. Law Offices of Michael P. Margelefsky, LLC, 518 F.3d 433, 438 (6th Cir. 2008) (stating that.the FDCPA imposes strict liability but an exception “exists only where a debt collector commits a violation resulting from a “bona fide error”);Ross v .
“The FDCPA typically subjects debt collectors to liability even when violations are not knowing or intentional.”