Spann v. State (2000)
green
· 24 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 11 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Darst v. State (2002)
Weekly D2125 , 2001 WL 991584 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug.31, 2001); Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (en banc); Mills v. State, 773 So.2d 650, 651-52 (Fla. *683 1st DCA 2000) (Browning, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part); King v. State, 763 So.2d 546, 547 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 779 So.2d 271 (Fla.2000); Light v. State, 667 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
en banc
green
Fussell v. State (2002)
With respect to double enhancements, "the double jeopardy clause does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended." Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)).
quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)
green
State v. Moore (2009)
Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)).
quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)
green
Roberts v. State (2006)
Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)).
quoting State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla.1989)
green
Mills v. State (2002)
See Brown v. State, 789 So.2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA) (applying prison releasee reoffender statute), review denied, 796 So.2d 535 (Fla.2001); Mills v. State, 773 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (applying habitual felony offender statute); Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (applying prison releasee reoffender statute); King v. State, 763 So.2d 546 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (applying habitual felony offender statute); cf. also Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655, 658 (Fla.20…
applying prison releasee reoffender statute
green
Hernandez v. State (2002)
Fluckers v. State, 785 So.2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Mills v. State, 773 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), review granted, 790 So.2d 1105 (Fla.2001); Alfonso v. State, 761 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(en banc).
en banc
green
State v. Hearns (2007)
See, e.g., Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that BOLEO is a qualifying offense for sentence enhancement under subsection ( o ) of the PRR statute without analyzing the statute); Brown v. State, 789 So.2d 366, 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (relying on Spann in holding that BOLEO is a qualifying offense under the PRR); State v. Crenshaw, 792 So.2d 582, 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (following Brown ); Branch v. State, 790 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ("[B]attery on…
holding that BOLEO is a qualifying offense for sentence enhancement under subsection ( o ) of the PRR statute without analyzing the statute
green
Jenkins v. State (2004)
See Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)." Brown v. State, 789 So.2d 366, 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
green
Brown v. State (2001)
See Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
green
Perez v. State (2000)
Compare Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).