How cited: Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen · Go Syfert

Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen (2009)

green · 22 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 18
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. (2013)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
A district court abuses its discretion if “it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App.2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009), appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“Remand for additional findings is appropriate when the district court fails to make adequate findings.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 718, 720 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“If the change was made in good faith, then the obligee should share in the hardship as if the parties had remained together.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 717 (Minn. App. 2009), review 6 granted (Minn. Sep. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010) (quotation omitted).
green In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010); see Dobrin v. Dobrin, 569 N.W.2d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
green In re the Marriage of: Christopher Hutchenson Owen v. Angela Dawn Owen (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“Remand for additional findings is appropriate when the district court fails to make adequate findings.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 718 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Julie Ellen O�Mara-Meyer v. William Philip Meyer (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“Effective appellate review of an award of maintenance is possible only when the [district] court has issued sufficiently detailed findings of fact to demonstrate its consideration of all factors relevant to an award.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 718 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 5 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
quotation omitted
green In re the Marriage of: William David Wilder v. Michelle R. Wilder (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster (2016)
Quote Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 720 (Minn. App. 2009) (“We conclude that the findings about appellant’s means to pay the attorney fees are inadequate because we cannot determine how the district court assessed appellant’s means.
“We conclude that the findings about appellant’s means to pay the attorney fees are inadequate because we cannot determine how the district court assessed appellant’s means. We therefore remand for additional findings.”
green Heidi Jo Olson v. Mark Douglas Olson (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009), appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires v. Vernon D. Schires (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“A district court abuses its discretion . . . when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010). 5 The Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply at OFP hearings.
green In re the Marriage of: Andrew James Carl Trupe v. Christin Marie Sohns (2016)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009) and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
And we will not disturb factual findings concerning spousal maintenance unless they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted).
quotation omitted
green Taras Lendzyk v. Laura Lee Wrazidlo, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
A factual finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted), review dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
quotation omitted
green In re the Marriage of: William John Braun v. Candida Marie Braun (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), review granted (Minn. Sept. 29, 2009), and appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble (2015)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
“A district court abuses its discretion when it makes findings unsupported by the evidence or when it improperly applies the law.” Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009), appeal dismissed (Minn. Feb. 1, 2010).
green Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto (2014)
Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.
Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen, 767 N.W.2d 711, 716 (Minn. App. 2009).