Hanley v. Hanley (1999)

green · 7 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Santos v. Santos (2015)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

This was error.”); Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So.2d 529, 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“In the, final judgment, the trial court erroneously relied on the first outdated report and found that the wife earns1'approximately $3,012 per month instead of the updated figure $4,118; arrived at in the supplemental report.”).

“In the, final judgment, the trial court erroneously relied on the first outdated report and found that the wife earns1'approximately $3,012 per month instead of the updated figure $4,118; arrived at in the supplemental report.”

green CRYSTAL NADEAU v. HENRY REEVES (2021)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See Hilbrands v. Hilbrands, 320 So. 3d 938 , 940 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (“[I]t is error to impute additional income to a party based on ‘in-kind contribution[s]’ from a new spouse.”); Hinton, 725 So. 2d at 1158 (“The effect of a former spouse’s remarriage to a new spouse who can contribute to expenses may be an increase in the former spouse’s disposable income after he or she pays child support obligations, but it plays no role in calculating child support.”); see also Hanley v.…

citing favorably to Hinton

green Kuttas v. Ritter (2004)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So.2d 529, 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (affirming the requirement that the father continue to pay one-half of the private school tuition beyond the child's eighteenth birthday because the trial court explicitly stated that the child's special needs justified the expense).

affirming the requirement that the father continue to pay one-half of the private school tuition beyond the child's eighteenth birthday because the trial court explicitly stated that the child's special needs justified the expense

green Mitchell v. Mitchell (2003)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So.2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

green Bryan v. Bryan (2000)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Hanley v. Hanley, 734 So.2d 529, 530-31 (Fla. 4th DCA) (on mot. for certif.), rev. dism., 743 So.2d 12 (Fla. 1999).