United States v. Garces, Angelo V. (1998)

green · 37 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199820122026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Kelly (2007)

Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · signal: cf.

Id. at 324 , 107 S.Ct. 1149 ; cf. Garces, 133 F.3d at 74 (“[W]e find neither search nor seizure in [the agents’] carrying the key about the house to determine its evidentiary value.”); United States v. Menon, 24 F.3d 550, 560 (3d Cir.1994) (stating that agent executing a search warrant did not seize documents when she moved them to another room for a fellow officer to inspect).

“[W]e find neither search nor seizure in [the agents’] carrying the key about the house to determine its evidentiary value.”

green United States v. Warren L. Pindell (2003)

Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.

It is clear that the requirement is satisfied, however, where the officers had “probable cause” to believe that an item was incriminating “without the benefit of information from any unlawful search or seizure.” Garces, 133 F.3d at 75. 4 And because the touchstone is probable cause, see United States v. Washington, 12 F.3d 1128, 1133 (D.C.Cir.1994) (holding that “the incriminating nature” of an item was “immediately apparent” where “the police officers had probable cause to …

green United States v. Pindell, Warren (2003)

Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.

It is clear that the requirement is satisfied, however, where the officers had ‘‘probable cause’’ to believe that an item was incriminating ‘‘without the benefit of information from any unlawful search or seizure.’’ Garces, 133 F.3d at 75.4 And because the touchstone is probable cause, see United States v. Washington, 12 F.3d 1128, 1133 (D.C.

green United States v. Williams (2024)

Rule Authority · D.D.C. · 2 citations in this opinion

Id. at 72.

green United States v. Thomas (2020)

Rule Authority · D.D.C. · 2 citations in this opinion

Garces, 133 F.3d at 74.

green State of Tennessee v. Ambreia Washington (2025)

Rule Authority · Tenn. · signal: cf.

Cf. Garces, 133 F.3d at 75.

green State Of Washington, V. Zachery K. Meredith (2021)

Quote Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

Ed. 2d 564 (1971)); United States v. Garces, 133 F.3d 70 , 74 (D.C.

“A warrantless seizure [of property] may be validated by the consent of someone with authority over the property.”

green United States v. Burroughs (2012)

Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., United States v. Garces, 133 F.3d 70 , 74 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1998).