How cited: Early Detection Center, PC v. New York Life Insurance · Go Syfert

Early Detection Center, PC v. New York Life Insurance (1986)

green · 180 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 49 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 835 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986)).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. App. 1986) (per curiam).
per curiam
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986)); see also Admiral Ins.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 835 (1986) (per curiam).
per curiam
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich.App.1986); see also Fenestra Inc. v. Gulf Am.
Rule Authority · 4th Cir.
green Fronning v. Jones (1996)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 835 (Mich.Ct.App.1986); 3 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652 E (1977); see also Baggs v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., 957 F.2d 268 , 273 (6th Cir.) (recognizing false light tort under Michigan law), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 975 (1992); Tobin v. Michigan Civil Serv.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 834 (1986). 44 At least two federal courts of appeals have interpreted section 46 of the Restatement (2d) to require preemption when the allegedly outrageous conduct arguably was governed by CBA provisions.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. 1986).
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618, 632 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986) (“However, a claim for civil conspiracy may not exist in the air; rather, it is necessary to prove a separate, actionable, tort.”)).
“However, a claim for civil conspiracy may not exist in the air; rather, it is necessary to prove a separate, actionable, tort.”
Rule Authority · Haw. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 834 (1986) (holding that the filing of a groundless lawsuit was not of such an extreme nature so as to be characterized as outrageous and atrocious).
holding that the filing of a groundless lawsuit was not of such an extreme nature so as to be characterized as outrageous and atrocious
green Sutherland v. Mizer (2008)
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618, 632 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986) (“claim for civil conspiracy may not exist in the air; rather, it is necessary to prove a separate, actionable, tort ... since plaintiffs have failed to state any actionable tort theories in their proposed amended complaint, the conspiracy theory must also fail”).
“claim for civil conspiracy may not exist in the air; rather, it is necessary to prove a separate, actionable, tort ... since plaintiffs have failed to state any actionable tort theories in their proposed amended complaint, the conspiracy theory must also fail”
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986) (noting civil conspiracy “may not exist in the air” and “since plaintiffs . . . failed to state any actionable tort theories in their . . . amended complaint, the[ir] conspiracy [claim] must also fail.”); Swain v. Morse, 957 N.W.2d 396 , 409, n. 13 (Mich. Ct. App. 2020); Mercurio v. Huntington Nat'l Bank, No. 361855, 2023 WL 4981374 , at *10 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 3, 2023); Mapson v. Farmers Ins.
noting civil conspiracy “may not exist in the air” and “since plaintiffs . . . failed to state any actionable tort theories in their . . . amended complaint, the[ir] conspiracy [claim] must also fail.”
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. 1986); accord Advoc.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Life Insurance Co., 157 Mich. App. 618, 632 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986)).
green White 225440 v. Perron (2021)
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986)); see also McCarthy v. Sosnick, No. 293482, 2011 WL 4424344 (Mich. Ct. App. Sept. 22, 2011) (reiterating that “any civil conspiracy must be accompanied by a separate, actionable tort.”); Michigan Non-Standard Jury Instr.
Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986))).
green Holden v. Kertesz (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 835 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986)); see also McCarthy v. Sosnick, No. 293482, 2011 WL 4424344 (Mich. Ct. App. Sept. 22, 2011) (reiterating that “any civil conspiracy must be accompanied by a separate, actionable tort.”); Michigan Non-Standard Jury Instr.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 403 N.W.2d 830, 834-35 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986) (discussing both torts).
discussing both torts
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich. App. 618, 632 (Mich. App. 1986).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618, 632 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986); see also Dauenhauer v. Bank of New York Mellon, 562 Fed.Appx. 473, 483 (6th Cir.2014); Collins v. Wickersham, 862 F.Supp.2d 649, 660 (E.D.Mich.2012).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
green Collins v. Wickersham (2012)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618, 632 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (Mich.Ct.App.1986).
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
There is nothing illegal, unethical or fraudulent in filing a lawsuit, whether groundless or not.” Early Detection Ctr, 157 Mich App at 631 (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986) (“[A] claim for civil conspiracy may not exist in the air; rather, it is necessary to prove a separate, actionable, tort.”)), aff'd in pt & rev’d in pt o.g., 479 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 836 (1986); accord Ram Products Co. v. Chauncey, 967 F.Supp. 1071, 1083 (N.D.Ind.1997); Anthony v. Madison, 896 F.Supp. 714, 717 (E.D.Mich. 1§95) (applying Michigan law).
green Kemp v. Pfizer, Inc. (1994)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Co., 157 Mich.App. 618 , 403 N.W.2d 830, 834 (1986) (“resorting to a court of law for the resolution of its dispute” was not extreme or outrageous).
“resorting to a court of law for the resolution of its dispute” was not extreme or outrageous
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Early Detection Center, PC v New York Life Ins Co, 157 Mich App 618, 630-631 ; 403 NW2d 830 (1986).
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Early Detection Ctr, PC, v New York Life Ins Co, 157 Mich App 618, 630 ; 403 NW2d 830 (1986).