State v. Ramos (1992)
green
· 7 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Wilburn (2012)
State v. Ramos, 598 So.2d 267, 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding that it is permissible during a valid Terry 1 stop for an officer to ask the person detained for identification.).
holding that it is permissible during a valid Terry 1 stop for an officer to ask the person detained for identification.
green
O'NEAL v. State (1995)
The United States Supreme Court so held in Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1039-40 , 104 S.Ct. 3479, 3483-84 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778, 786 (1984) and this court reiterated the principle in State v. Ramos, 598 So.2d 267 , 268 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) ("Whether or not the stop was lawful, the identity of the defendant obtained during the stop is not subject to suppression.") (citing Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. at 1039-40 , 104 S.Ct. at 3483-84 , 82 L.E…
"Whether or not the stop was lawful, the identity of the defendant obtained during the stop is not subject to suppression."
green
State v. Diaz (2003)
See, e.g., State v. Ramos, 598 So.2d 267, 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding that police officer may request driver's license to ascertain identity of person during an investigatory stop).
holding that police officer may request driver's license to ascertain identity of person during an investigatory stop
green
State v. Leyva (1992)
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1039 , 104 S.Ct. 3479, 3483 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778, 786 (1984); see also State v. Ramos, 598 So.2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA May 12, 1992). [7] Under settled doctrine, the arrest of a defendant is not subject to suppression nor a charge to dismissal, on the ground that the arrest was illegal.