Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chemical Corp. (1980)
green
· 21 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Senator Linie Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Sunway Line, Inc. (2002)
Corp., 499 F.Supp. 94, 101-02 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (finding shipper liable for improper stowage of hazardous chemical under theories of negligence and express warranty, but mentioning neither § 1304(3) nor § 1304(6)); Di Gregorio v. N.V.
green
Senator Linie GMBH & Co. KG v. Sunway Line, Inc. (2002)
Corp., 499 F.Supp. 94, 101-02 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (finding shipper liable for improper stowage of hazardous chemical under theories of negligence and express warranty, but mentioning neither § 1304(3) nor § 1304(6)); Di Gregorio v. N.V.
green
DCC Propane, LLC v. KMT Enterprises, Inc. (2024)
Corp., 499 F. Supp. 94, 97 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) (finding, after bench trial, that defendant negligently violated the HMR and was liable to plaintiff); Clark v. Velsicol Chem.
finding, after bench trial, that defendant negligently violated the HMR and was liable to plaintiff
green
United States v. M/V Santa Clara I (1995)
Hooker, 499 F.Supp. at 102 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
green
O'Connell Machinery Co. v. M.V. \Americana\"" (1986)
Cf. Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chemical Corp., 499 F.Supp. 94, 98-99 (S.D.N.Y. 1980) (no duty on carrier to open and inspect sealed container absent indication of abnormal or dangerous condition, assuming shipper otherwise appears to have complied with applicable shipping regulations).
no duty on carrier to open and inspect sealed container absent indication of abnormal or dangerous condition, assuming shipper otherwise appears to have complied with applicable shipping regulations
Cf. Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chemical Corp., 499 F.Supp. 94, 98-99 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (no duty on carrier to open and inspect sealed container absent indication of abnormal or dangerous condition, assuming shipper otherwise appears to have complied with applicable shipping regulations).
green
English Elec. Valve Co., Ltd. v. M/V Hoegh Mallard (1986)
Oct. 18, 1984) (Judge Knapp found that it was the custom and practice in the Port of Genoa to stow flat rack containers on deck) (adopted as final decision by Order of Jan. 14, 1985); Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chemical Corp., 499 F.Supp. 94, 100 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (“It is not generally unreasonable to stow a container on the deck of a vessel equipped for such stowage.”) EEV contends that the relevant custom is that pertaining to the proper stowage of over-height contain…
green
Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc. (1993)
See id. at 102 .
green
Emil Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc., United States Lines (s.a.), Inc., United States Lines, Inc., Reo… (1993)
See id. at 102 .