In Re Griffin (1992)
green
· 26 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199420102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Lampe v. Williamson (In Re Lampe) (2003)
In re Lampe, 278 B.R. at 213 ; see also In re Griffin, 141 B.R. at 210 (“Since co-ownership of personal property acquired during marriage is allowed, the Court must be able to determine its existence from evidence of the intent and conduct of the party claiming title, unless some rule of law prevents it.”).
“Since co-ownership of personal property acquired during marriage is allowed, the Court must be able to determine its existence from evidence of the intent and conduct of the party claiming title, unless some rule of law prevents it.”
green
Lampe v. Iola Bank & Trust (In Re Lampe) (2002)
Stat. Ann. § 58-501 ; In re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207, 211 (Bankr.D.Kan.1992); Walnut Valley State Bank, 574 P.2d at 1385 ; that presumption arises only after co-ownership is established.
green
In Re Brollier (1994)
In re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207, 210 (Bankr.D.Kan.1992).
green
In Re Kieffer (2002)
In re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207, 210 (Bankr.D.Kan.1992).
green
In Re Hall (2008)
See also In re Zink, 177 B.R. 713, 715 (Bankr.D.Kan.1995) (holding that husband and wife could both claim tools of the trade exemption because both had an ownership interest in the property and both were engaged in farming as their primary occupation), In re Kobs, 163 B.R. 368, 373 (Bankr.D.Kan.1994), and In re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207, 210 (Bankr.D.Kan. 1992). 24 .
green
In Re Zink (1995)
See In re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207, 210 (Bankr.D.Kan.1992).