How cited: Bouie v. State · Go Syfert

Bouie v. State (2001)

green · 25 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 13
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green M.L. v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In adult cases, “[wjhen punishing [an individual] for contempt, a court must follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830.” Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
green Rhoads v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
"When punishing [an individual] for contempt, a court must follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830." Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
green ML v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In adult cases, "[w]hen punishing [an individual] for contempt, a court must follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830." Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
green AMANDA C. MICALLEF vs STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“When punishing [an individual] for contempt, a court must follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830.” M.L. v. State, 819 So. 2d 240, 242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (alteration in original) (quoting Bouie v. State, 784 So. 2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)).
green Castaneda v. State (2012)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
This rule “define[s] the essence of due process in criminal contempt and must be scrupulously followed.” Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
green Martinez v. State (2008)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). "[T]he indirect criminal contempt process requires that all procedural aspects of the criminal justice process be accorded a defendant, including an appropriate charging document, an answer, an order of arrest, the right to bail, an arraignment, and a hearing." Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457, 460 (Fla.1993).
green Sando v. State (2008)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (explaining that the provisions of rule 3.830 constitute the “essence of due process in criminal contempt proceedings and must be scrupulously followed”).
explaining that the provisions of rule 3.830 constitute the “essence of due process in criminal contempt proceedings and must be scrupulously followed”
green Keeton v. Bryant (2004)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“When punishing [an individual] for contempt, a court must follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830.” M.L. v. State, 819 So.2d 240, 242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (citing Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)).
green Alex Diaz De La Portilla v. State of Florida (2014)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (failure to appear in court is punishable by direct criminal contempt); Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27, 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (failure to appear at a sentencing hearing can be direct criminal contempt); Porter v. Williams, 392 So.2d 59, 60 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (“Non-appearance pursuant to an order of the court is normally considered a direct criminal contempt since it is committed in the immediate view and prese…
failure to appear in court is punishable by direct criminal contempt
green Maniatakos v. Hirsch (2013)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
green Neilinger v. Jenne (2002)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27, 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
green Martinez v. State (2001)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See Speer, 742 So.2d at 373 (reversing direct criminal contempt order for failure to appear where nothing in record indicated appellant had been ordered to appear); see also Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (same).
same
green Kress v. State (2001)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that the provisions of rule 3.830 must be scrupulously followed in criminal contempt proceedings).
holding that the provisions of rule 3.830 must be scrupulously followed in criminal contempt proceedings