Sunshine Chevrolet Oldsmobile v. UAC (2005)

green · 7 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 3

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Mid-Florida Freezer Warehouses, Ltd. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (2010)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Sunshine Chevrolet Oldsmobile v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 910 So.2d 948, 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

green Rivera v. Board of Trustees of the City of Tampa's General Employment Retirement Fund (2016)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

Furthermore, in such proceedings, “[h]ear-say evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining other evidence, but it shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions.” § 120.57(l)(c); see also Sunshine Chevrolet Oldsmobile v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 910 So.2d 948, 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Yost v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 848 So.2d 1235, 1237 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

green A.S. v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Sunshine Chevrolet Oldsmobile v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 910 So.2d 948, 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (explaining that testimony of a custodian is “the predicate necessary to admit the [documents] as a business record exception to the hearsay rule”).

explaining that testimony of a custodian is “the predicate necessary to admit the [documents] as a business record exception to the hearsay rule”