How cited: Hurt v. Naples · Go Syfert

Hurt v. Naples (1974)

green · 17 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Widening the field of candidates is the rule, not the exception, in Florida.” Hurt v. Naples, 299 So.2d 17, 21 (Fla.1974); Treiman, 342 So.2d at 975 .
green Hamidullah v. Burke (1998)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
In Hurt v. Naples, 299 So.2d 17, 21 (Fla.1974) citing Ervin v. Collins, 85 So.2d 852, 858 (Fla.1956), our Supreme Court observed: It is the sovereign right of the people to select their own officers and the rule is against imposing disqualifications to run.
green Ago (1983)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Att'y Gen. · signal: see also
Treiman v. Malmquist, 342 So.2d 972 (Fla. 1977); see also , Hurt v. Naples, 299 So.2d 17 (Fla. 1974) (holding that denial of candidacy should be based on an express legislative provision for ineligibility and further that ineligibility for office cannot be judicially prescribed by implication).
holding that denial of candidacy should be based on an express legislative provision for ineligibility and further that ineligibility for office cannot be judicially prescribed by implication