How cited: Sanders v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc. · Go Syfert

Sanders v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc. (1996)

green · 16 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Fla. 1997) (conflicts with both Rule 8(a) and Rule 9(g)); Teel, 953 F. Supp. at 1538-41 (no conflict); Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 942 F. Supp. 571, 575 (S.D.
no conflict
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
Group, Inc., 966 F.Supp. 1188, 1190 (S.D.Fla.1997) (conflicts with both Rule 8(a) and Rule 9(g)); Teel, 953 F.Supp. at 1538-41 (no conflict); Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 571, 575 (S.D.Fla.1996) (no conflict); Al-Site Corp. v. VSI Int’l, Inc., 842 F.Supp. 507, 512 (S.D.Fla.1993) (no conflict); State of Wisconsin Inv.
green Jones v. Krautheim (2002)
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Pratt & Whitney, 953 F.Supp. 1534, 1538-41 (S.D.Fla.1997); Sanders v. Mayor's Jewelers, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 571, 575 (S.D.Fla.1996); Al-Site Corp. v. VSI Int’l, Inc., 842 F.Supp. 507, 512 (S.D.Fla.1993). 5 .
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
The Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers ease addresses the issue of suits against individuals under the Florida Civil Rights Act. 942 F.Supp. 571, 573-74 (S.D.Fla.1996).
Cited (see also) · S.D. Fla. · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion
See Al-Site, 842 F.Supp. at 511; Plantation Square, 761 F.Supp. at 1580; see also Sanders, 942 F.Supp. 571 , 576 n. 5.
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 571 (S.D.
holding that complaint alleging “discriminatory intent” or marital status “as motivating factor” was sufficient to state a claim
green Lapar v. Potter (2005)
Cited (see also) · M.D. Fla. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, 942 F.Supp. 571, 574 (S.D.Fla.1996) (holding that, like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Florida’s Civil Rights Act applies to impose liability on employers, rather than individuals.) Count IV of the complaint is thus dismissed as to the individual Defendants Denise Jones, Mike Little, and Ray Bernicchi pursuant to Rule - 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P.
Cited (see also) · N.D. Fla. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 571, 573-74 (S.D.Fla.1996) (declining to construe identical statutory provisions under Title VII and the FCRA as to produce meanings that differ “widely enough to submit a whole new class of defendant to suit in discrimination actions brought under the FCRA”).
Cited · M.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Sanders v. Mayor’s Jewelers, Inc., 942 F.Supp. 571, 575 (S.D.Fla.1996); Al-Site, 842 F.Supp. at 512-13 ; State of Wisconsin Inv.