How cited: Bennett v. State · Go Syfert

Bennett v. State (1975)

green · 168 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 13
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197520002026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Valle v. State (1985)
Rule Authority · Fla. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 100 (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green Cox v. State (1981)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
On the other hand, our decision in Jones v. State concerned the present issue of testimonial reference and was cited with obvious approval by the supreme court in Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 42 (Fla. 1975).
green Cox v. State (1981)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
On the other hand, our decision in Jones v. State concerned the present issue of testimonial reference and was cited with obvious approval by the supreme court in Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 42 (Fla.1975).
green Lornitis v. State (1981)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 44 (Fla. 1975); Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976).
green Dorman v. State (1981)
Rule Authority · Alaska
Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 42-44 (Fla.1975); Dozier v. State, 361 So.2d 727, 728 (Fla.App.1978).
green Marshall v. State (1981)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Even assuming the evidence was of that character — in which assumption we must entirely disregard Marshall's testimony — we are bound by Florida Supreme Court decisions that when the accused's custodial silence is improperly proved, and a motion for mistrial is made, reversal follows "without consideration of the doctrine of harmless error." Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 44 (Fla. 1975); Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976).
green Mansfield v. State (1976)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 42 (Fla. 1975).
green Del Monte Banana Co. v. Chacon (1985)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1975) (during the course of interrogation, questions should be propounded to prove facts by direct testimony emanating from the witness rather than by insinuations or innuendoes suggested by the interrogator); Smith v. State, 414 So.2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (questions insinuating impeaching facts which are not *1173 proved or are nonexistent are impermissible).
during the course of interrogation, questions should be propounded to prove facts by direct testimony emanating from the witness rather than by insinuations or innuendoes suggested by the interrogator
green Williams v. State (1979)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1975); Eck v. State, 354 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), and Spann v. State, 340 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
green Burch v. State (1978)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41, 44 (Fla.1975).
green Brownlee v. State (1978)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1975); Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976); Webb v. State, 347 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
green Nevels v. State (1977)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1975); Martin v. State, 334 So.2d 841 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); and Shannon v. State, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1976).
green Acee v. State (1976)
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also, Bennett v. State, 316 So.2d 41 (Fla.1975).